this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
128 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
15 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

tweet in which jon points out the obvious and libs get mad

excerpt from a Libbrainworms:

Jon gives his best impression of a 14 year old tankie in this video.

The following is true simultaneously:

  1. It is appropriate to critique US foreign policy, it's actually necessary in a free society.
  2. Some bad actions are worse than others. Iraq wasn't annexed into the 51st state, as opposed to Crimea, Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia.
  3. Not all foreign policy decisions are zero sum, it's possible for both parties to derive a benefit from an agreement (US and Philippines for example).

what a great deal

amerikkka i receive Military bases and access to your natural resources

you philippines-cool received: a US backed dictatorship

  1. The world does not revolve around the US, people in the Kremlin have agency.
  2. The Russian invasion of Ukraine and PRC threats of a Taiwan invasion are not about US foreign policy, they are a response to internal Russian and PRC pressures.
  3. Not every policy decision is based on trade and natural resources, those some of the variables in a long list of strategic considerations.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Which is worse:

Both. Both are horrific. It's like the trolley problem: it's artificial and you shouldn't solve it

[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ok.

But I think 150 million Russians being plundered by the US again actually is worse.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So far nobody talks about plundering Russia, unless Putin attacks the Baltic states.

But TBH, given how the West implements sanctions, this plundering would look like they're shooting in their leg.

[–] TechnoUnionTypeBeat@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

Nobody's outright talking plunder but friend, what do you think the ultimate outcome is here?

Libs won't stop until Russia either balkanizes into a shattered Libya-style failed state that the West can gobble up piecemeal under the guise of helping them recover, or the Russian government changes to an explicitly pro-EU one that empties its coffers in a show of newfound solidarity

For the West, there is no world in which Russia will be allowed to exist as a sovereign state. The end goal, full stop, is to plunder it, even if that's not the stated goal

[–] flan@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nope. Both Russia and the US are fucking imperialistic states.

Thinking that Russia is somehow left inclined is insanity

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thinking that Russia is somehow left inclined is insanity

That's not what anyone here is claiming. Our critical support is for the Russian Federation's opposition to US hegemony. No one thinks they are "left" in any way

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They've literally written horseshoe theory sarcastically. If you are not aware, horseshoe theory is a claim that is far right and far left are quite similar.

Here we have completely different situation where we fucking have 2 nazi states opposing each other. Eventually, they'll compromise leaving the world in the middle of a catastrophe

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

I was deliberately referring to the poster quoted in OP who stated:

Some bad actions are worse than others. Iraq wasn't annexed into the 51st state, as opposed to Crimea, Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia.

It was a dunk pointing out that they're arguing against themselves but don't realize due to American exceptionalism. I agree that Russia is not aligned with the left, and personally would like to see the war ended, but to be realistic, Russia will not just leave, especially when they have the upper hand (which it is clear they now do). As a resident of the US, the most I can do to end the war is to call on our government to work towards negotiations, as peace would obviously be the best case for the working class in both countries. However, the US and its allies more broadly would prefer to continue looting Ukraine and to make money for their arms industries, so they aren't in any hurry, and they will instead insist on that ludicrously unrealistic scenario where Russia just stops for no reason as a means to prolong the war instead without having to say so.