this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1913 points (89.9% liked)

Political Memes

5419 readers
3772 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1913
Just a reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What if the options are sharp stick or dull stick?

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 6 points 5 months ago

Do you really want me to answer that for you? Is it really that hard to think for yourself?

Alright then... You get either one or the other, there's no way out of that whether you make a choice or not. Wouldn't you still want to influence the choice so you get the one that hurts a lot less?

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean at that point you struggle to escape, but assuming that's definitely not possible, then sharp sticks hurt less. 🤷‍♂️ "Optimal" does not necessarily mean "good" or "desirable".

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Sharp sticks hurt less...

What?

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, equally deep and long injuries with a sharper implement destroy fewer cells (since they have a smaller cross-section), cause less trauma, and are less disruptive to the surrounding tissues. I know it's unintuitive, but it's true.

[–] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

Thank you. That's what I was trying to say.

[–] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The dull stick is going to gouge your eye out entirely. I have no frame of reference of what would hurt more, but I guess that would be it.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No a dull stick would probably fuck your eye up, a sharp stick will absolutely destroy your eye.

[–] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That entirely depends on how deep the stick goes into your eye - though at some point it won't matter anyway.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes if fired the dull stick out of a fucking cannon it would destroy the eye, how many bits of criteria are we going to add to this (what should be anyway) very straightforward analogy?

[–] VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are times when a clean cut hurts less than a crude one. We're not talking about actual damage done, which wasn't part of the analogy to begin with.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dude you're talking about shoving a stick into your eye. What part of a stick will provide a clean cut?

[–] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

The budget cuts to essential programs