LGBTQ+

2720 readers

239 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

518

The abs that shook the pillars of civilization (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 months ago by uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Moldy Monday continues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lady_scarecrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

saying gender is not a construct is a strong/radical statement in the context of theory

To be clear, I'm saying gender identity isn't a social construct (gender roles definitely are). And that's hardly a radical statement given that there is a genetic factor to being trans, as evidenced by e.g. twin studies like this one which found a much higher amount of cases where both twins are trans among identical twins (who have the same genetic code) than non-identical twins. Also, like I mentioned before, a lot of trans people feel considerable relief to their own gender dysphoria upon seeking hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgeries, which is quite hard to explain on a social basis.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To be clear, I’m saying gender identity isn’t [entirely] a social construct

Then I’m with you 100%.

Sorry for going straight to pedantic bitch over semantics, but sometimes it’s injected as a wedge issue by bad faith actors with local clout, and then burying the lede is a mistake.

Coherency on the gender constructionism thing is a phalanx for everyone in the space (protecting mostly trans folk now, others later) because the potential contradiction in the gender [identity/expression] distinction and the resulting confusion (quickly seen here) is continually weaponized by phobes in an old but still popular have-it-both-ways narrative about wokism.

Thanks for coming back to reply to everyone.

ETA clarity and context