it looks like somebody in this story doesn't understand the difference between strategy and tactics, which definitely seems like quite an important distinction in this case
whenthebigonefinallyhitsla
You're assuming a strawman that doesn't exist
i'm not saying you're deliberately constructing the argument
i'm saying you're a useful idiot carrying water for the far right without realising it
Do you have something constructive to add?
👀
the booth is constructed around them and then raised into the air with a crane, and the support built below
However I don't agree that having concerns equates to being a racist.
big "i'm just asking questions" energy
this is just borderline sealioning
so you waded into a conversation about the rioters to ask an unrelated question?
cool thank you for the valuable discourse
pretending that there's a question posed by these riots about immigration is just pretending that that's the question far right rioters are asking, which is just an attempt to rehabilitate blatant racism in the eyes of an uninformed observer, and by doing it you're just being a useful idiot
i'm sure the far-right rioters are concerned mainly with the detailed cost-benefit analysis of how current and future immigration strategy could impact the uk's fiscal outlook, and not with anything else at all
f35 is like a bee if you tell it it can't fly it will drop out of the sky
what about the winter games?
mueller released the report in 2 volumes, one talking about russian interference and collusion, and one talking about obstruction
it seems pretty clear from the quote and rest of the source that he's not talking about obstruction there
the memory hole
thinking tactically is short term, thinking strategically is long-term, especially with the "plan ahead" in the title
nothing about the test described in the article implies that horses are capable of doing that though