universalfriend

joined 1 month ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Zimmer and Brank in Wonderland 2 in c/funhole@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 19 hours ago

Thank þee for þine non verbal cozt𐡔zx.

Leetl chinkin looks worried; i hope everything is oll korrekt

Cult behaviour rule in c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

>:(

You busy yourself with things that are of no benefit to you. in c/funhole@lemmy.sdf.org
Happy bean day! in c/doodles_of_beans@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Thanks You
Bean Leaf Beetles must've got'n to'em

‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎ in c/funhole@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

might remind one of an criminal event from the source by ted hearne

Happy bean day! in c/doodles_of_beans@lemmy.sdf.org
Happy bean day! in c/doodles_of_beans@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Happy bean day! in c/doodles_of_beans@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Happy bean day! in c/doodles_of_beans@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL HOLE OF FUN in c/funhole@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

~~Is the pleasure taken in the subsumption of one's [content] an example of joy that should be surrendered, or is it indicative of an avenue towards socketable operance|?~~

woaw, exciting content!
i cannot wait to purchase and consume additional content!

content creator slur in c/funhole@lemmy.sdf.org
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

~~I’m so sorry this happened to you.~~

Thank you for creating content!

YSK Snopes.com was taken over by investors in c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world
[–] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interesting analysis of perceived motives between interaction environments; thank you.
I am glad for all the discussion in, and response to, this thread.

85
Capital AIdea rule (i0.wp.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
15 comments fedilink
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk

35
literally me rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
247
YSK Snopes.com was taken over by investors (en.wikipedia.org)
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes#Change_of_ownership
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Richmond_(entrepreneur)#Snopes.com_lawsuit

https://www.wired.com/story/snopes-and-the-search-for-facts-in-a-post-fact-world/
https://www.courthousenews.com/fact-checker-snopes-owners-accused-corporate-subterfuge/
https://web.archive.org/web/20220923232402/https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/snopes-co-owners-acquire-remaining-140000348.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovrn_Holdings

Snopes.com has been thought of as a reputable and trusted site for fact-checking.

From 2016 to 2022, the original mom-and-pop owners were sued out of their company in what was described as a "hostile takeover".
Snopes is now owned as a for-profit "programmatic advertising business".

view more: next ›