sping

joined 1 year ago
[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Could you explain what he's saying about caret (presumably cursor?) positions because I can't make sense of it.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 6 days ago

I naively thought it I may as well take a job using Go, as learning a new language is broadening, and some people like it, so lets find out first hand... I knew it was a questionable choice, looking at how Go adoption tailed off a while ago.

Turns out I hate Go. Sure it's better than C but that's a very low bar, and C was never a good alternative choice for the use cases I'm encountering. I'm probably suffering from a codebase of bad Go, but holy shit it's painful. So much silent propagation of errors up the stack so you never know where the origin of the error was. So very much boilerplate to expand simple activities into long unreadable functions. Various Go problems I've hit can be ameliorated if you "don't do it like that", but in the real world people "do it like that" all the time.

I'm really starting to feel like there are a lot of people in the company I've joined who like to keep their world obtuse and convoluted for job security.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

floppy drive, hard drive, sechs drive — we got building blocks. Crowd sourcing a joke could work.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Avoid categories where a lot of items have fake specs (storage devices, LED bulbs, anything that claims a runtime on a Li-Ion battery)

I'd say be aware rather than avoid. E.g I bought a $10 camping lantern that claimed 2.5 times its true capacity, but it still runs for hours and is a great, well designed, if flimsy, product for the price.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sort option by "orders" is good for this. Far from infallible but still useful.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Excellent, the punchline is sorted, now we just need the rest of the joke.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

That's a much broader term.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Although I came from vi (pre-vim and pre-evil) and still have the muscle memory, I don't and haven't used it myself.

I hear it described as a "nearly complete" and "very comprehensive". There is definitely a solid community of people using and enjoying it, but on the other hand there are always some reports of getting tired of having to work through, and sometimes extend, an additional interface layer, so in the long run being happier to just adopt the default bindings.

I know there are a few areas where trying to follow common vim workflows doesn't work as well. Historically the performance of line number display been weak in Emacs, though I believe it's recently much improved. A lot of people seem to make heavy and constant use of it in vim but conversely for me (and I think it's more common in Emacs) it's only an occasional, transient need when some external log or error quotes a line number, so I have them only displayed when I hit the go-to-line binding.

Overall, I think the most frustrating issues people have trying to adopt Emacs from vim are due to trying to impose their specific familiar vim workflows. The most obvious example is people concerned with startup time, but for more typical Emacs workflows it's a non-issue. Users typically stay in Emacs rather than jumping in and out of it from a terminal (and if you really want that workflow, you run one instance as a daemon and pop up a new client to it instantly). My Emacs instance's uptime usually matches my computer's uptime.

The draw of Emacs is not about it only being an editor so much as a comprehensive and programmable text environment. It is a lisp-based text-processing engine that can run numerous applications, the primary being an editor (the default, or evil, or others...) but also countless other applications like file managers, VC clients, subprocess management and many others. It 95% replaces the terminal for me, and many other tools. So it's the environment through which you view and manipulate all things text that is very accessible to modify and extend to fit your needs. Hence the joke about it being an OS is pretty apt, though to believe it needs a good editor implies vim isn't a good editor ;).

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Which Emacs community? I've been following it for ages in a few places (Reddit is the most common) and I literally do not encounter any of that. Calling it evil was humor - as if people who went to all the bother making it would be trying to push people away...

Using the evil package is very popular and often recommended, which means literally using it like vim, but with all the Emacs ability on top. I don't know what on earth you're talking about.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

And yet Emacs users don't fight vim users. Emacs users decided vim's interface was pretty cool and added it to Emacs. Somehow people still call it a war though.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've had buffalo wings, and American barbecue. Also I've been to American Thanksgiving meals with weird things like sweet potatoes with marshmallows on. So I've had some American ethnic food for one thing.

 

In Cambridge, MA, USA, and nearby communities, bike advocates have made real progress with lanes and paths and general infrastructure. Also the city requires that new builds have a proper bike room. This building was recently gutted and fitted out and this is the bike room today - overloaded, and the building is barely half full... Looks like they will need to find more efficient bike racks!

Meanwhile in a recent commute I was in a queue of 30 bicycles at a light at which about 6-8 cars get through at a time. 10-15 years ago I was one of the few bikes on the roads at any time.

Hats off to the advocates and representatives of the local cities that have made this happen through continuous pressure and work over decades...

 

The lack of keyboard interface on Lemmy is killing me, but really what I want is a good client in Emacs. However, it's beyond my Elisp to design and start such a project, but I could probably help. Anyone on it?

view more: next ›