sambrown

joined 6 months ago
[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the 2015 film "The 5th Eye"

From imdb:

A priest, a teacher and a farmer breach the security of a NZ spy base in Waihopai and deflate a satellite dish dome to draw attention to NZ co-operation with illegal US wars. The extent and implications of mass government surveillance.

See the trailer at NZ On Screen.

 

Sam Neill might describe the article as follows:

Ah, what a fascinating tale! Imagine this, if you will: in the quiet of 19th-century New Zealand, amidst the sheep paddocks and rolling hills, a gentleman by the name of Samuel Butler pens a prophetic letter. The year is 1863, and he warns of a danger not from invading armies or natural disasters, but from machines.

Now, Butler was no ordinary farmer. With an intellect as sharp as the Canterbury wind, he saw in the Industrial Revolution a glimpse of the future—a future where machines could evolve, much like Darwin’s finches, into entities surpassing their creators. Writing under the pseudonym "Cellarius," he likened this mechanical evolution to humanity's domestication of animals, suggesting that one day, the tables might turn. We, the creators, could become subservient to our creations.

Butler's letter, aptly titled "Darwin among the Machines," is chillingly prescient. He imagined a world where machines grew more sophisticated, more autonomous, and potentially more dominant. And though his era’s most advanced devices were little more than mechanical calculators, Butler extrapolated with eerie accuracy to a future where artificial intelligence might challenge humanity’s supremacy.

Fast-forward to today, and the echoes of Butler’s concerns are unmistakable. From OpenAI’s GPT-4 to debates in legislative halls, the question of how to control our technological progeny remains as pressing as ever. Butler’s call for a dramatic rollback of machine progress might seem extreme—he proposed nothing less than the destruction of all machines—but his fundamental warning about humanity’s growing dependence on them rings true.

Ultimately, Butler’s legacy isn’t just his prescient fear of machine dominance but his reflection on humanity’s relationship with progress. His voice, carried through the ages, reminds us to tread carefully as we march toward an uncertain future. A Canterbury sheep farmer warning of AI takeover? Remarkable, isn’t it? And perhaps, just perhaps, a tale worth heeding.

[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's all fallen out of patent and generics are available. Dr. John David Sinclair did a lot of research in the 80s and devised "The Sinclair Method". I've seen it work to disrupt decades of entrenched behaviour. It might not be the silver bullet but it's definitely a stepping stone in the right direction.

The winning point from my perspective is that the person is usually instructed to take the pill and continue to drink normally, which almost anyone is willing to try. Continued drinking is actually how the pill works, it dulls to "reward" which means that the drinking behaviour isn't reinforced. Over time, the brain rewires itself to forget that "alcohol = good". The drinking behaviour must continue to achieve the rewiring. Then over time, the person just stops caring about alcohol so much.

There's a TEDx talk if you want to hear someone talking about their personal experience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EghiY_s2ts

 

Naltrexone works by reducing cravings and the pleasurable effects of alcohol. All the person has to do is take a pill daily. The person doesn't need to change any other behaviors or quit cold turkey. It just makes people want alcohol less.

The person doesn't need to be a total train wreck to get help. It has been prescribed for "hazardous drinking", which affects about 670,000 of us. Talk to your GP for more info.

https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/datasheet/n/naltrexonetab.pdf

[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 weeks ago

But in New Zealand, despite efforts by governments, councils and individuals, sustained increases in the use of alternative modes of transport remain elusive.

The article links to a 2023 Auckland census. Anecdotally, when I ask my Auckland friends if they ride to work, they share horror stories about riding in the city.

The article then goes on to showcase a success story in Christchurch where the council invested in cycle ways and better transit while the university also worked to encourage alternative modes of transportation.

Perhaps they the article should have said "Auckland" instead of "New Zealand" in that sentence.

[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's only fair to mention that I took the bite out of the pizza. It didn't come that way.

I am mostly just surprised at how few mushrooms there are.

 

Sal's Pizza seems to be saving $0.78 in mushrooms on every pizza and now losing one customer because of it.

I've noticed it getting slimmer and slimmer over the year, but this is just "fuck you" level.

[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You're right. They were looking for something like breath testing for alcohol. You can see that in the bill history.

On legislation.govt.nz, you can see the legislative history under the "View whole" tab.

Legislative history

  • 30 July 2020: Introduction (Bill 317–1)
  • 4 August 2020: First reading and referral to Transport and Infrastructure Committee
  • 17 June 2021: Reported from Transport and Infrastructure Committee (Bill 317–2)
  • 11 August 2021: Second reading
  • 16 February 2022: Committee of the whole House (Bill 317–3)
  • 8 March 2022: Third reading
  • 11 March 2022: Royal assent

If you go back through all the versions and amendments, you can see they originally tried to introduce a saliva test. The transport minister then recommended blood tests. One could speculate that was due to research and submissions.

Committee of the Whole House included amendments to use saliva only as an indicator of use, while relying on blood tests to measure levels. This enables officers to administer compulsory road-side oral swabs as a precursor to taking someone in for a blood test.

Section 71A "Who must undergo first oral fluid test", which includes "a driver of, or a person attempting to drive, a motor vehicle on a road". This enables random roadside testing without a specific reason. This was acknowledged as a violation of NZBORA which was deemed in the public interest by the Land Transport Act 1998.

So, if you drive a car in any mental state, get ready for the cops to stick stuff in your mouth.

[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

From Schedule 5 of the legislation:

  • 3 ng/ml is the "high-risk blood concentration level" for THC.
  • 1 ng/ml is the "tolerance blood concentration level" for THC.

What is the difference?

Medsafe says:

Schedule 5 has two blood concentration levels for each listed qualifying drug: tolerance and high-risk.

Exceeding the lower level (tolerance) is an infringement and could result in a fine or licence demerit points.

Exceeding the higher level (high-risk) could result in a criminal charge and the driver may be disqualified from driving or sentenced to prison.

To get an idea of what other countries are doing see https://www.ncids.org/2021/marijuana-impairment-faq/

How long can THC be detected in the blood after ingestion of marijuana?

“Low THC levels of a few nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) in blood can result from relatively recent use (e.g., smoking within 1 – 3 hours) when some slight or even moderate impairment is likely to be present, or it can result from chronic use where no recent ingestion has occurred and no impairment is present.” - Compton at p. 7.

Don't get me wrong. I don't want to be on the road with a bunch of stoned people but it seems pretty bleak to me. A medical user could definitely hit 1ng/ml without being impaired.

There is another RNZ story on this from 11 Oct.

[–] sambrown@lemmy.nz 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I really like:

Okay kids, we're going to take a nap and then when we wake up we're going to clean the house!

They nap for ages...

 

Foil Arms and Hog "Getting Past New Zealand Immigration"