pankuleczkapl

joined 1 year ago
[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand that receiving DMCA's may cause fear, but keep in mind that online communities are very exposed to such action, and handling DMCA notices should be a part of normal operation. Someone always isn't going to like what you are hosting and will try to shut you down legally.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It does have a lot with DMCA. Maybe not specifically the DMCA, but all the relevant regulations all around the world that are equivalent to DMCA because of copyright treaties. And yes, while you are right about Germany being more dangerous in terms of piracy (mainly because of copyright trolls), the relevant authority handling the case could very well be the USA court system.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, there is a tool: https://github.com/CMahaff/lasim/releases. I recommend lemm.ee for general use, or dbzer0 if you are really into piracy.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And here you are (after fighting with docker for an hour) http://pankuleczka.ydns.eu/

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Sure, if someone uses it then it's no problem for me. There are much bigger communities already out there though, so I see no reason to do that. I'll set it up right now to show you

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I can openly admit I am breaking the law for example by using torrents for piracy - and I seed as much as I can, though it in theory makes me liable. So yes, I am the change I want to see - piracy should be free to discuss everywhere

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Pre-legal action such as DMCA requests or cease and desist letters

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From DMCA.com:

The document stipulates the content that has been stolen and republished without permission with a request for removal. It must be created and submitted in a specific manner so as to comply with the law. Failure to do so means the "notice" to remove the content will not be followed by any party involved in the infringement.

In exchange for the immediate removal of the content the publisher receives safe harbor from litigation regarding the illegal publication of copyrighted content.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I think you don't understand what a DMCA notice actually is. The whole point of it is to give you a chance to remove offending content. The "threat" of legal action won't actually result in anything, provided you comply, and that is exactly why I do not understand the preemptive actions, when there is basically no such thing as immediate legal threat in case of DMCA notices. The copyright holders often do not want to go through the court system either and will gladly accept pre-legal-action compliance.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.world 746 points 1 year ago (131 children)

These communities are not even hosted on lemmy.world, this is an absurdly overreacted response. There were no signs of any legal trouble and I can't understand how lemmy.world specifically would be the target of such legal action. If you want to host an instance, you should do everything in your power to allow discussions on any topic, while in necessary cases disallowing direct posting/linking of illegal content. Instead, you chose to block a community that has long been known to avoid having any trouble with the moderators.

view more: next ›