nsrxn

joined 1 week ago
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

no, you don't need to accept it.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

it is immoral to flip the switch and murder someone. that doesn't make the situation acceptable

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (11 children)

but they have no responsibility for the circumstances.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (12 children)

you can't murder through inaction, unless words don't mean anything.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (14 children)

but some of them choose to become murderers

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (13 children)

the whole damn trolley problem thing

doesn't have an answer. it's a thought experiment to expose your personal ethics. deontologists never touch the switch.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (18 children)

you can't be responsible for something you didn't cause. that's not how responsibility works.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (34 children)

voting makes them responsible for the bodies.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

this is bigotry

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

don't tell me what to do

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago (36 children)

Everyone who didn't vote got what they asked for

the only thing they clearly wanted was no winner

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 10 hours ago

because out of two candidates, one is always better than another

if neither one should have power, I'm not voting for either one

view more: ‹ prev next ›