Yeah they're wired, larger grocery stores were kind of a problem because they need up to like 10gbps connection, which is pretty abnormal for a grocery store. Because yes, almost all of the video is processed in the cloud, although they are trying to shift more of it to processing on devices in the stores.
nationalize_amazon
It's not really about shoplifting, the cameras are a core component of the system, and if they could use fewer they would. Say what you will about the concept, but the cameras themselves aren't really the insidious part, in my opinion.
Any given shelf is generally visible by like 6-8 cameras.
I mean yeah, you can try, but it's actually kind of difficult. It's way easier to steal from any conventional store, probably.
One thing I know for a fact that is probably the most troubling/dystopian, is that the technology absolutely exists and works pretty well to be able to track the movements of every individual person in a crowd, including by having multiple camera angles as a person moves in and out of view. Drones, satellites, and street cameras can absolutely be used to do this on a fairly large scale, and I have to assume it is being done. Amazon's technology in particular isn't exactly doing this and I don't necessarily think they are providing it to 5 eyes or whatever, but I know for a fact it can and is being done at least for some BS convenience stores.
I mean, to scan in is still really quick, it's like going into a subway or something.
I mean, they test it a lot. It seems like the general philosophy though was that the ways of fooling the system reliably are somewhat convoluted, so if someone is willing to do all that, just let them lol.
Amusingly, one of the particular vulnerabilities that they mentioned having problems with in the UK in particular was people just brazenly going into a store, taking down some cameras or other equipment (networking equipment, edge compute, etc.) and Just Walking Out.
I spent a decent amount of time thinking of how best to shoplift from there, lol. My best idea is that with some decent slight of hand, you could easily fool the system into thinking you took 1 product instead of 2, or you returned an item when you actually didn't. And then you can challenge your receipt to make them fix it. There are a lot of camera angles, but they are only 14fps, and it can still be pretty tough to tell what someone is actually doing even if they are acting totally normally and non-maliciously.
Another funny theory I had is that to beat the tracking system, you could lie down or something. It's not something I ever tested in practice, but their tracking system relies heavily on the assumption that everyone is standing upright, so maybe if you rolled on the floor a little it would get confused. But when it gets confused it goes to one of those low paid workers in India or Costa Rica, so it might get corrected manually.
The stores have gates that prevent entry until you scan the code. You could maybe hop the turnstyle, but there's usually at least one employee near the front to "help people get in". And to be fair, lots of people have questions about it so it's not entirely bs, but I guess their job is also to dissuade this.
I agree lol, but from what I remember, billing errors were more likely to cause you to be undercharged rather than overcharged.
Nah, Amazon Fresh is just a regular grocery store. They still have a bunch of other stores with this technology, especially third party vendors i.e. other companies in stadiums and airports mainly who have a contract with Amazon.
It's super expensive, prohibitively so for now although they might actually bring down the cost. But they're allegedly finding that sales are actually higher in their in-stadium stores compared with the alternative, so it might actually have a legitimate advantage there. Plus they mostly sell overpriced beer there, so it's not totally crazy that it could be profitable.