I didn't know about this one. But this is a very old building and much smaller than the three WTC towers; it's very understandable that this compromised building fell in the described way. You just adressed one point and proceeded to tell I'm just believing some nonsense. If you read better what I said, you will note I didn't even say I believe it was a controlled demolition. I said it is much more likely than the official explanations.
leo_da_vinci
joined 2 years ago
Maybe some info got leaked, it got attention in Asia, and then the USA had to say something. But even if this was the case, it would still be strange that they admited it.
I believe the USA has "astroturfing squads" for this kind of work. This is one more evidence of it. Social media is likely flooded with astroturfing activity from the USA government. They also likely manipulate the social media software to help in this. For example, YouTube has a comment filter that automatically deletes comments that contain certain words; because of this filter, if you say certain things, the comment gets deleted, and you don't know it unless you look for the comment. Most comments I make on YouTube about geopolitics get deleted. A way to get the comment delivered is to hide likely banned words or expressions by inserting a space in the middle of the word. For example, the comment "China wages developement. America wages wars." will likely get deleted. To deliver it, you could write "Chi na wa ges developement. Ame rica wa ges wa rs.".
The animal I talked about is called "onça-pintada". It's not necessarily black. It's the third biggest feline, being smaller than the tiger and the lion. It's the most powerful predator in Amazon rainforest. People often say it's the most powerful in the Americas, but they are wrong, then. I didn't know the english words for "onça-pintada" and "jacaré" and just put them in translator.
The jaguar (onça-pintada) should be higher. They are arguably the most powerful predators of the Americas. They can run up to 80 Km/h; they can climb trees; they have jaws strong enough to crush bones; they are proficient swimmers, being able to hunt prey in the water, including alligators; their roar is bone-shivering; they are stunning and iconic; they are important for the ecosystem balance. Note that while the jaguar may be phisically similar to the African leopard, the jaguar is faster and stronger, and a better swimmer.
26
During a visit to queen Elizabeth, Biden asks:
"How is your parliament so effective?"
"Because I pick very smart people for their positions", the queen answers.
She then phones Boris Johnson.
"Boris, answer me. If your mother has a child, and it's not your brother nor sister, who is it?"
"It's me", says Boris.
Back in the US, Biden calls Kamala and asks her the same question.
"I have to think about it and I'll give you my answer soon", she says after thinking for a minute.
At evening, Kamala asks her husband the question.
"That's easy. It's me", he answers.
The following day, Kamala goes confident to the White House.
"Mr. President, I have the answer to your question. The child of my mother who is not my brother nor my sister is... My husband!"
Biden goes mad and, while shaking her shoulders, shouts:
"You idiot! It's Boris Johnson!"
Perplexity summary: The article from Bloomberg[1] reports that Huawei's latest smartphone, the Mate 60 Pro, is powered by a new Kirin 9000s chip that was fabricated in China by Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC). This chip is the first to utilize SMIC's most advanced 7nm technology, which suggests that the Chinese government is making some headway in attempts to build a domestic chip ecosystem. The article also notes that Huawei is reportedly developing its own Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and power management chips. Other sources, such as Swarajya[2], ThinkChina[3], TechHQ[4], and The Verge[5], speculate on how Huawei was able to develop its own chips despite US sanctions. Some sources suggest that Huawei may have used its inventory from 2020, while others speculate that the chips were manufactured by SMIC or even Huawei itself. Chinese benchmarking website AnTuTu has identified the Mate 60 Pro's CPU as the HiSilicon-designed Kirin 9000s, which supports 5G[6]. Overall, the article and other sources suggest that Huawei's use of domestically produced chips in the Mate 60 Pro is a significant development in China's efforts to build a domestic chip ecosystem and circumvent US sanctions.
That's in part because of all the anti-China propaganda on big media and youtube. In youtube, anti-China content, specially content from big media (BBC, sky news and the likes) and CIA-backed content, is recommended to much more users than pro-China content. Just look at the number of views of anti-China videos vs neutral or pro-China channels. Anti-China videos easily get millons of views, while the best of the best pro-China videos only reach tens or hundreads of thousands of views (one or another may reach millions by using a super catch thumbnail and title). The pro-China videos are mostly recommended to people that already watches pro-China videos, while anti-China videos get recommended for everyone on youtube. The result is that a huge amount of youtube users believe anti-China crap.
It's so toxic how they always talk about efforts to keep America the best this or the best that. They talk as if for them the priority is to do everything (even moraly wrong things) to make America be the best at everything, being human progress only a byproduct of this competition. They also talk as if America be the best at everything is necessary for the world to be "right"; as if this is something inherently good.
Not-so-fun fact: Rick Sanchez was possibly created with the same name as the news anchor Rick Sanchez (from CNN and RT) deliberately to hide him in the internet. Rick Sanchez himself made a video about this. He found a video made by an RM creator before RM creation in which there is a news transmission with an anchor called Rick Sanchez, showing that the creators of RM knew who him was before creating RM.
Greta Tintin Eleonora Ernman Thunberg, also known as GtG (abbreviation for "Greta the Great"), is a Swedish revolutionary communist leader. She was one of the main figures in the movement for neutralizing imperialism (MNI), and is one of the leading politicians in the multipolar world order (MWO). She had a key role in the partial recovery of Europe's sovereignty after decades of vassalage to the United States of America. Greta is also an environmentalist, and is known for the creation of the "Program for sustainable and just society". She is the author of the books "We need red to protect the green" and "Why we need to overthrow capitalism to save the Earth".
GtG is known for her direct and impactful statements in public speeches, addresses and summits. One of the most notable one is "How dare you tell us how to rule our countries when your own country has the highest debt and one of the highest inflation in the world". This was said to American president John Dickanhaughty during the third Euro-American summit. She said the phrase after the American president tell in a way that she considered "annoyingly condescending" that the socialist countries in Europe are, in John's words, "dangerously moving away from the correct form of democracy".
Greta started her career as an environmental activist. But she gradually moved to the sphere of politics. Her political ascension was initially aided by the empire, which saw her as a suitable ally in its agenda. But when she became a very successful and established politician in Europe, she broke up with the empire and revealed that she was actually a communist from the beginning. Trevis Tuckerson synthesized this cleverly: "GtG tricked the imperialists into believing that they were using her, when in reality she was using them to get funding and popularity".
GtG's successful socialist system applied in Sweden was used as a model for other European countries, such as Serbia and Greece.
A remarkable curiosity is that Greta almost always uses red clothes. She considers red "the leader of all colors" and "the optimal complement for the green of nature".
view more: next ›
Niels Harrit research was peer reviewed. See this.
Are you assuming the points are "unevidenced" without actually analysing them? Or did you really analyse them? E.g., did you have an explanation for the molten steel coming out of the windows here, or for the other claims of the specialists in the documentary? (I'm citing the documentary because it puts togheter a lot of the points and has the footages, but of course my sources are not just the documentary; I actually only saw this documentary recently).
I recognize there is some points hard to explain in the demolition theory, like how they managed to put the charges in the building. But it's harder to explain how that three huge, robust buildings, with footprints about the size of soccer fields, fell by fire with temperature lower than the fusion point of steel, symmetrically and reaching free fall or near free fall acceleration.
It's not only engineers, firefighters and pilots. People from geopolitics also talked about this. Pepe Escobar hinted more than once (to portuguese-speaking audiences) about the official history of 911 being wrong (he avoided entering in details).
There was also a recent tweet from someone that works for Chinese government (at the time I didn't see which was his position, and I don't have the tweet anymore) that explicitly tells USA did 911. It was a joke about what each country thinks USA does. For each country USA invaded, the answer was a photo of the invasion. For USA, the answer was superman saving the world. Then, there was "What you really do", and it was an image of WTC collapsing. This was just a joke, but the joke does tell that USA did 911. Of course, this does not prove anything, since it is just someone claiming something, even if this person works for Chinese government; but it's at least interesting.
When you thrust the government reports without actually knowing if the physical model and simulations they made for the collapse are right, you are thrusting them for their authority.