kommarihipsteri

joined 1 year ago
[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

CS:GO, ~1500 hours

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Could you specify, which extension, I'm also interested in this

 
[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Taitaa jäädä patikointireissu väliin... Sääli.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That's a trippy bathroom

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
 
[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Dot-world was updated today. Maybe it was down when you tried to log in?

Does it work now?

 

I saw this post on Europe@Lemmy.World: https://lemmy.world/post/2387220

I got me in a philosophical mood.

Is it okay to burn a Koran?

On one hand, a Koran, a Bible or anything else "sacred" literature is paper and ink. And burning them is just disposing of said book. Children are taught at young age not to get provocated by provocators. Adults should be able to live with this principle.

On the other hand, burning is not the main reason people get upset when sacred literature is burnt. The whole burning ordeal is (usually) a symbol for hate. Hate should not be tolerated, and therefore it is wrong to burn a sacred books. It is imporant to make hateful actions illegal to prevent hate from spreading. If hate is allowed, then we are possibly facing hate crimes and violent actions towards minorities.

Burning a sacred book is not always about hate. It can also be a symbolical protest. In sweden, a few weeks ago, Iraqi man burned a Koran. According to news I read at the time of said event, the man justified his actions as a protest against Iraqi government. He was kept prisoner in his homecountry and tortured during his imprisonment.

Iraq is a theocracy. Amputations and even death sentence are used as forms of punishment. People are not equal and theistic law is above other laws. The country does not follow UN's declaration of human rights. These human rights are recognized all over the globe and should be held as standards for all.

If someone burns a sacred book to protest torture, amputations or death sentences, I think it is not morally wrong, but quite the contrary. Burning a book is a victimless crime. Forementioned actions of Iraqi government however are not.

Thoughts from an European atheist.

Im interested to hear your thoughts on this matter and hoping to understand this question from different perspectives.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Paywall? I can't access the article.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Those mATX's are usually cheaper than ATX ones, since those don't have as many slots for cards.

Could also be that this particular board has features that OP didn't find on an ATX board, like WiFi support.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you are second-guessing about the CPU, you can't go wrong with the 7800X3D. It is more expensive yes, but also a beast. With that you don't have to upgrade for many years.

You have 64 GBs of RAM. 32GBs i more than enough, unless you do heavy video editing or other reaaally professional stuff. You should take 32GBs and use that money for better CPU or GPU.

I have been using Nvidia for a long time and haven't had time to get into AMD scene, so I really can't give any input on your choice of GPU.

Water cooling is not necessarily better than air cooling. Check out this video by JayzTwoCents for input: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQ3c0kspOb8

Be sure to buy a fan for rear exhaust! I didn't see one preinstalled in the case.

And lastly about the monitor. You probably could get a cheaper FreeSync monitor. Be sure to check extensive reviews that test all aspects of the monitor. That means no reviews from PC Gamer etc.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

So wannabe Elon Musk is copying Elon Musk and twitter?

Just keep making the platform even more unaccessible and user-unfriendly. I'm sure the users don't mind or change platforms.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, price caps are against the principles of the free market. So, on an ideological level it doesn't make sense.

Any ideology hardly ever works as it is, so changes need to be adapted to make the ideology work. Capitalism is very much tied to western electoral "democracy". The idea in capitalism is that the economy works as a separate entity from government. This simpy is not true since it is the legislation that allows for capitalism to function in the first place.

The so called " free market" has never been free. When there is a crisis, governments give aid to capitalists, which is againts capitalistic principles. Capitalism would not function without governmental intervention and would collapse. The price caps are simply just a another tool to preserve capitalism.

Price caps can also be a way to limit profits made by capitalists. Basic necessities like water, food and electricity should have price caps in a way, that profit cannot be made.

But at the end of the day, price caps are a tool to preserve capitalism, not to change economical status quo.

[–] kommarihipsteri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

He about to question his sexuality

 
 

Näin opiskelijana pelottaa, että mitä syksy tuo tullessaan kun eduskunnan kesätauko loppuu. Ainakin tukia leikataan sen verran, ettei riitä asumistuki + opintotuki enää maksamaan vuokraa kokonaan. Asiaa mutkistaa vielä keliakia ja autoimmmuunisairaus, eli lisäkuluja tulee n. parisataa kuukaudessa. Onneksi on Kela. Ilman tukia en selviäisi kuluista millään. (Etenkään lääkkeistä)

Teen töitä ja opiskelen. Mitä muuta Orpo kekkeruuseineen multa kaipaa?

Ilmeisesti on kannattavaa leikata opiskelijoilta ja muilta pienituloisilta, että saadaan halvempaa bisseä ja kasvatettua kotitalousvähennyksiä.

Vittu.

 
view more: next ›