No license?
foster
I maintain a rule that all files above the repo must be inside a folder, with one exception: a README file. Including the code
folder, this typically results in no more than 5 folders; the project folder itself is kept organized and uncluttered.
Don't forget: entrepreneur, playboy, philanthropist.
They are the project's subfolders (outside of the Git repo):
code
contains the source code; version-controlled with Git.wiki
contains documentation and also version-controlled.designs
contains GIMP, Inkscape or Krita save files.
This structure works for me since software projects involve more things than just the code, and you can add more subfolders according to your liking such as notes
, pkgbuild
(for Arch Linux), or releases
.
I tend to follow this structure:
Projects
├── personal
│ └── project-name
│ ├── code
│ ├── designs
│ └── wiki
└── work
└── project-name
├── code
├── designs
└── wiki
From a time when websites used <table>
or position: absolute;
to place elements on the screen. That website is just one big table.
And pretty much the rest of the FSF and GNU websites.
Where the dotfiles at?
I recommend Peer Calls as an alternative. Peer Calls uses peer-to-peer communication similar to Jami. You can check out Peer Calls on Github for more info.
So, in short, the things I really like about it:
- Simple to selfhost - Only one Docker container with no dependencies (database, storage, etc.) and you only need to forward HTTP/S traffic.
- Lightweight - You get voice and text chat; screen and file sharing. All of it directly P2P.
- Private - Selfhosting the signaling server will grant you control over the only step which requires a central server during the WebRTC connection process.
- No accounts - Just start using, no accounts are involved.
Just bookmark the repos you like; no Github account needed.
Definitely best to get that done ASAP. Forgejo being a drop-in replacement for Gitea won't be guaranteed ever since the hard fork:
To continue living by that statement, a decision was made in early 2024 to become a hard fork. By doing so, Forgejo is no longer bound to Gitea, and can forge its own path going forward, allowing maintainers and contributors to reduce tech debt at a much higher pace, and implement changes - whether they’re new features or bug fixes - that would otherwise have a high risk of conflicting with changes made in Gitea.
Pretty much the same for me: bleeding-edge Arch for my workstation, rock-stable Debian for my server.