flamingarms

I think for me the issue is the price and the niche usecase. I could just prop my laptop/tablet up and use remote play, if they expanded remote play to do this same thing. So it feels like for the price, we're getting a device that is a Frankenstein of a controller and tablet, but can only be used for streaming PS5 games locally. Feels like something that will have zero resale value too, ya know? So it's just the value proposition for me.

Same! Haven't read them in ages, but this makes me want to find some again. Looks like the first game was pretty bare bones and didn't get great reviews as a result. Hopefully this one will improve on that; I'd love a good Asterix beatemup.

If you'll afford me a long comment, I have an example that I think will explain my confusion. If you check the Oxford dictionary, you'll see it define "gravity" as a force. Let's say someone says "gravity is a force" in a thread much like this. I and others clarify "well, it presents as a force in some respects, but very much not like one in others." People respond "No, it's a force." I clarify further how that's not entirely the case. "Check the dictionary." Yes, but the dictionary is just trying to summarize a very complex subject in physics and is not a replacement for the sciences. "No one is equating the dictionary and the sciences, but people still use the dictionary definition."

I understand that; indeed that's how this thread formed. What I don't understand is why, when I say that gravity is not entirely a force, it is met with a rejection of that clarification and nuance. Gravity is not entirely a force; it's way more complicated than that. Racism is not just prejudice; it's way more complicated than that. I'm confused why this is such an issue.

The dictionary is not a replacement for the social sciences, friend. It seems like you have a narrative in your head about why I am arguing this point, but I'd like to point out that your argument is currently standing on "but the dictionary though" in the face of decades of research.

I don't know who that is; first time talking with them as far as I know. I don't mind engaging with someone until they seem disingenuous; but yeah, that's where I've reached with that person. A short reply of "check the dictionary" is not the sign of someone wanting actual conversation. Guessing you've had a similar run-in with them.

Forefinger of the man farthest to the left looks split to me too.

Lol mate, you're being willfully obtuse. As you already know, there is knowledge beyond the confines of the dictionary, and the dictionary is merely attempting to summarize a very complex subject. If you'd like to broaden your perspective, you can turn to the research which is where I'm pulling my definition. If you'd like to understand why it's so important to include those other things I mentioned in the definition, there's plenty of reading opportunities to explain that.

Yes, and racism is also a social hierarchy and systemic structure that utilizes tools of oppression to allow the in-group to have power and control over the out-group. Calling it prejudice alone is not acknowledging the full picture.

Sure is. But "White" is prejudice at worst, not racism. Racism includes the inherent power dynamics and systemic racism against minorities.

...so these Hexbear folx have got a chip on their shoulder, huh?

From scanning through their comments, I'm guessing they don't actually believe the shit they're saying? Only because, if they did, I would think they would actually try to have a discussion with people instead of whatever firestorm is happening on this thread. I'm not up to date - is this a troll instance?

Right, but as so many other threads have acknowledged, not everyone is capable of paying a large upfront cost to save them in the long-term. That's one example of why it's more expensive to be broke. That's why I'm responding to these comments - it's not all ignorance or stupidity; people are broke out here.

I'd love one, thanks for raffling them off!