eduds6

su-57 is the winner!

No, it was in fact because Lula and PT are doing the same economic plan of bolsonaro in slow motion and with negligible tax rate increase to the bourgeoisie, so they allowed him to take power with US help as they are allied to the US. The bourgeoisie factions who helped the coup stayed without major support and it failed. They are the "lite" right-wing preventing the left from doing anything.

They have been flying already. But i doubt very hardly the interceptions were anywhere near the ratio these people claim

Inflation in Russia is only high if considering what neoclassicals/monetarists/neoliberals think about inflation. But this school of economics is not always dominant outside the western world and was imposed as part of its washington consensus economics, the cold war dictatorships such as Chile and Brazil, by the IMF, and by intellectual/theoretical colonialism and right-wing/libertarian NGOs. As an example, marxist economists (in terms of what is traditionally seen as macroeconomics, planned economy) and especially developmentalist economists are dominant in Brazil in universities (although the landowner/financial oligarchy and the army restricts them from getting in power as Brazil is a US colony in disguise), and in fact developmentalism is common in latin america. MMT has seen a growth in other countries.

I doubt there are F16s there.

Rojava is the puppy baby of the schizo "post-left" and their fith-collunism around the world

Because they don't want to mobilize as Russia is neoliberal. Russia has an independent central bank. If putin was so dictator and powerful like the West says, be would have already done that. The only people benefiting from this war are private Russian military companies. Russia should mobilize and wipe out the Ukrainian army, close the borders with the US and Japan with amassed troops, and prepare for a world war.

Historical revisionism of anglo-american economists, who are always neoliberal. for these busted people, even developmentalists or keynesians are "heterodox"

Explain to me how a liberal democracy where the high class has power like Russia is fascist. Is the US, therefore, fascist, being a oligarchy masquerading as democracy?

The narrative will never end. NATO will never consider Russia a censitary democracy in public, as that would undermine their propaganda. There is no autocracy in Russia, much less a dictactorship. But if they consider a censitary liberal democracy a autocracy, was 1914 france or 1950s america one of them, or were black people not humans for them?

What kind of Christian Socialist? The liberal ones? these are known to definitely be idealistic pacifists. (sorry im from brazil i lack a lot of knowledge about american politics)