crwcomposer

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
we have "sub-lemmys" but what we are missing for lack of a better term is "dom-lemmys", hear me out in c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
[–] crwcomposer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying those spaces can't be used. Ideally each instance would end up with its own set of popular communities that have become the one true community. But it's a much better user experience if every instance doesn't have all of the communities from every other instance duplicated.

20
Why does Kbin show posts from Lemmy instances with a source of kbin.social? The post in this image is from reddit@lemmy.ml , but it says kbin.social in the parentheses. (media.kbin.social)
 
we have "sub-lemmys" but what we are missing for lack of a better term is "dom-lemmys", hear me out in c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
[–] crwcomposer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay, but I see no reason to intentionally make that issue worse.

we have "sub-lemmys" but what we are missing for lack of a better term is "dom-lemmys", hear me out in c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
[–] crwcomposer@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Because if I subscribe to all of them, sometimes I will see 100 identical posts of the relevant news. And if I subscribe to just one, then I'm missing out on a lot of content.

we have "sub-lemmys" but what we are missing for lack of a better term is "dom-lemmys", hear me out in c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
[–] crwcomposer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

At first I thought this was a good idea, but now I'm not sure. Instead of encouraging the need for that sort of manual work to group every similar community for every topic, I think we should let the communities naturally converge on the winning community.