beefcat

joined 1 year ago
[–] beefcat@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The AI boom started last year, it's the reason prices are already high. So I'm skeptical that they are going to get higher, seeing as this whole AI thing feels like a bubble.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of the backlash cited in the article seems out of touch, this in particular:

User @akishmz tweeted: “Summer to remember that to the Barbie film team and to Hollywood more than 200,000 death by the end of 1945 (and half a million so far) by two atrocious bombs are something they feel comfortable joking about to promote their precious summer blockbuster.”

I must have missed the part where these memes are making jokes about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Have they? VRR support in Linux is still a total crapshoot in my experience. VRR doesn't work at all with multiple displays in X.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How is this false story still getting pushed to the top?

We literally just had a thread about it earlier this week. It was debunked.

The same story came up years ago, and it was debunked then too.

People will just believe anything these days.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

So what exactly should a community titled /c/brexit talk about if not brexit?

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None of these problems are really dealbreakers for a consumer-oriented file system in 2023. Not even ext4 supports CoW. Now that everyone boots off an SSD, things like file fragmentation no longer matter, and most of NTFS' continued slowness has more to do with Windows itself than the actual file system.

ReFS is Microsoft's new file system meant for more advanced use cases. It supports many but not all of these advanced features. Starting with Windows 11, you can actually boot off a ReFS drive, though I'm not sure that is a recommended configuration.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only game I've played that actually has 100+ hours of quality content is Persona 5.

Every other single player game trying to give me more than ~30 hours of stuff to do ended up being a chore.

I think part of it is that there is an ideal time commitment for story driven games and it is between 5 and 30 hours. It's similar for movies, where the ideal range is 90 t o150 minutes. There can be exceptions, made by particularly skilled people, but just because I enjoy the 4-hour cut of Return of the King does not mean I want the next Marvel or DC movie to be that long.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

People have been saying these things since 2020 and it has convinced me that people in online gaming forums are out of touch.

Here's my argument against the Series X though:

  • It has nothing I can't play on my PC. Even though Sony has started releasing their games on PC, their ports usually come years later. I don't hold this against Microsoft though, I'm more than happy to play games like Halo on PC instead of buying another console.

  • Sony console exclusives are better and more numerous than Xbox exclusives. This has been the case since the Xbox One.

  • The DualSense is a way cooler controller. I'm pretty miffed that the Xbox controller still doesn't have a gyroscope, When utilized properly a gyroscope makes aiming in shooters a lot easier.

So the way I see it, there isn't much reason to buy a Series X beyond its awesome backwards compatibility.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They're just people looking for attention.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Some random personal favorites of the last 10 years off the top of my head, in no particular order

  • Everything Everywhere All at Once (I know, I already mentioned this one, but it really liked it)
  • John Wick
  • Zootopia
  • Midsommar
  • The Grand Budapest Hotel
  • Mad Max: Fury Road
  • Arrival
  • Blade Runner 2049
  • Parasite
  • Isle of Dogs
  • Your Name
  • The Green Knight
  • Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
[–] beefcat@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

By these rules, Gone with the Wind likely wins.

But it's still not a good comparison because of other factors. First off, movie theaters didn't used to compete with television, cable, video games, DVDs, streaming, or social media for your free time. The industry was also a lot smaller, meaning there were fewer high profile movies dividing up that whole pie. The lack of practical home video also meant popular films like Gone with the Wind would get frequently re-issued and continue racking up ticket sales.

It is essentially impossible to accurately compare the popularity of any two movies separated by more than a decade or two.

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Not hard at all. I can already tell you I liked Everything Everywhere All at Once (this year’s BP winner) way more than Dances with Wolves.

1991 is a uniquely weak year for the Academy though. You might have had a stronger argument with 1994 or 1995, but I can still think of plenty of movies released in the last decade that I would rank up there with Schindler's List or Pulp Fiction.

view more: next ›