Yep. They definitly added a crypto miner into their opensource code. ๐
Voxel
Tbh. Mozilla wasn't better in the past and as long it doesn't affect the product I don't mind the political views of the owner (it's still concerning). As long Brave can provide me better privacy and security for my daily browsing I will continue using and recommending it. And listening to Wikipedia he stepped back, by himself.
You can't say that Mullvad or Tor are hardened Firefox Browser, that are completly different things and do have any arguments and evidence for what you say? That it doesn't make rly much sense? I mean it do. It seems more like your knowledge about Brave is pretty small while I do know a lot about both.
Brave and Chromium itself has same good firstparty isolution as Firefox. If you check https://privacytests.org/ you can compare it with LibreWolf which is prehardened Firefox and hardened Brave is stronger then hardened Firefox, due the fact it don't need to have a lot of users to function + it uses the hide in the crowd effect + randomization at the same time which is stronger then only trying to make everyone looking the same.
Probably.
The CEO was before CEO of Mozilla lmao, but stepped back, because the entire Internet hated Firefox, because of his political opinion.
Brave is OPENSOURCE ๐คฆโโ๏ธ And Ecosia does care more about the enviroment then your privacy. I prefer DDG or StartPage, or if you really wanna get sure, use somthing like SearXNG or LibreX.
You can use forks of Signal which removed the proprietary part. For example there is Molly (Hardened Signal) which has two version and one of them is fully foss.
There is enough evidwnce that this is wrong. I would recommend to watch Techlores Interview too.
I would like to see evidence for your claim that Firefox is more private.
That hasn't do anything with the results. You can test everything yourself. Techlore also made a interview with him.
I would suggest checking the Interview that Techlore made, he ask the owner of the site similar questions.