Trashrascall

joined 1 year ago
[–] Trashrascall@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it sounds pretty appealing. I think I'll make the switch when my bitwarden sub runs out

[–] Trashrascall@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Smart ill get a other NAS to backup the NAS then.

[–] Trashrascall@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks man, I really appreciate it.

[–] Trashrascall@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Any advice on the '0' in practice? What's the best way to ensure the files are free of error?

[–] Trashrascall@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

OK, thanks for the solid answer. I suppose the core of my question was that pretty much: is it just as secure AND a less likely target than bitwarden. That makes a lot of sense to me. I would probably still worry about the strength of the code , though. Do we know if/how it's been audited?

 

12tb+ of data and hoping to use it to periodically backup the data of numerous machines.

 

Not sure I understand why you'd want to self host a password manager. Bitwarden has never been breached AFAIK. How is it better or safer to keep if self hosted?