TokenBoomer

joined 1 year ago
[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Red meat for the grill.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 63 points 1 year ago (107 children)

Because of it’s truth?

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

I still believe in Russiagate. I’ll let PoppinKREAM of Reddit explain it better than I ever could. Don’t be gaslit into believing it didn’t happen.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for making me look up dirigistic.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks. I always appreciate your detailed comments that somehow make me feel inadequate, but also give me hope.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely. Socialism is the future. My question is whether that can eventually transition to true communism? Or whether it would be difficult to implement on such a large scale (worldwide). China seems best equipped to shepherd this. But a world wide change is a lot to ask.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol. Is Biden older than the deaths of the other three?

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you ask me, the capitalist class became obsolete as the production of tools used for education and distribution (books and especially computers and the internet) became sufficiently capable. We just haven't replaced it yet.

That is an interesting idea to think on. When the proletariat have the means to educate themselves, the bourgeoisie becomes irrelevant. It seems AI and advancements in 3d printing will accelerate this.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m gonna read this 3 more times, and maybe I’ll understand it. Okay, I think I understand. The modes of production determine the system employed dependent on historical context. So the mode of production can change because the current system (capitalism) is unsustainable. I’m sure Socialism is inevitable, but still not sure that true communism will follow. Maybe it’s a failure of my imagination and education, that given enough time communism will be inevitable too.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean complex in terms of specialization of production. Like technology. Most people don’t know how their food gets to their table, or how to repair a combustion engine. I’m interested in how that would be maintained in a communist environment. I know the Soviets became industrialized and technologically advanced, but that was with the help of the state. With no state under stateless communism, would technological advances slow or be sporadic? It just seems that the current system of complexity might suffer in a transition. This is all academic and probably irrelevant due to climate crisis, but it’s interesting for me to contemplate.

[–] TokenBoomer@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Got it. It’s good to see that others see the concept as achievable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›