TheDoozer

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I am having this conversation with my wife. I'm 16 years into a military career (so 4 years from retirement), and she was talking about moving to Canada. So for a thought exercise, I looked it up, and with my skill set it would be pretty doable.

But I reminded her that we aren't the ones in danger. A cis-het white family of natively-born Americans in the military with the economic stability to fly to Canada on a moments notice for an abortion (she was worried about our daughter) is not in particular danger. But us leaving means we can't fight against this, and makes it worse for those who can't just leave.

We'll see how it is in 2029 when I'm due to retire, if the country can pull its head out of its ass or if Project 2025 goes full swing followed by no legitimate election. But for now, we'll stay and push back.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Unless he was diagnosed as a pathological liar, they should not. Not that he isn't, because he is, but as a news organization they should only provide the facts, quotes, and unbiased contextual information. That is what we should expect from the news. It should not be "left-leaning" or "right-leaning," because they shouldn't tell us what we should think about what they are reporting.

They should report that some of his former (and possibly current, if it's accurate) aids and expected cabinet members wrote, participated, or supported Project 2025. They should report what Trump's response was when asked about it, as well as including the factual context of how many people directly surrounding him that were openly involved (to give the lie to him "not knowing").

We need news to stop giving opinion. Period. They should strive to be as unbiased as possible, including reporting on events based on newsworthy-ness, not trying to be "fair" to the candidates by reporting on both in an equally negative way regardless of the severity of their respective news (e.g. Obama's tan suit vs. Trump's children in cages.)

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

Mirror selfies seem like a very reasonable thing to do at a gym, particularly if you are looking for progress pics, taking the same picture in the same location while it's still in your mind.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm an American, and I had to ask my wife what that was the first time I saw it. And then I needed an explanation on why that was a problem, because I had thought the point of text messages was that you could read it and get back at your convenience, as opposed to a phone call you have to respond to in the moment.

Apparently I'm old.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've got a crazy idea that probably won't work, but who knows:

Let's start making tons of memes of Bibi making Trump his little bitch. Make fake quotes that make the rounds of Bibi calling Trump a useful idiot, or easier to control than Biden. Try to get Trump to see doing whatever Israel wants as being weak, and make him get into a huge row with Netanyahu.

Israel isn't Russia, and I don't think Bibi has Trump by the short hairs like Putin does.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Yes, where they argue over which convoluted plan that ultimately benefits insurance companies is "better" and which is "totally communism."

Excluding the obvious choice of everybody gets Healthcare at no higher average cost to the individuals.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He's like a bizarro Charlie Kirk.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

That got me upset enough that when I read "GI Joe movie" in your comment, it was the first thing I thought of, before reading the rest of your comment.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perfect, except there wouldn't be anyone on the lower track. But definitely gets the point across.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

I was going to make this, but put Palestine before the fork. And then put the person away from the lever refusing to participate when pulling the lever would move it to a track with nobody on it. Or pulling a different lever that does nothing (labeled Jill Stein).

Palestine is and will continue to get run over regardless who wins the presidency, so they aren't exactly relevant to the choice. It's not a real trolley problem because it's not a trade for different people. It's just "let the trolley run over Ukrainians, lgbtq+ people, minorities, and immigrants" or... don't. And then refusing to touch the lever because it somehow makes you "love genocide" to have anything to do with the trolley, even if to mitigate the damage.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

So what are the other choices?

view more: next ›