Sekoia

joined 1 year ago
[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dog heaven is also pig hell. It's a very efficient system.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

... man, if we ever meet Odalia in this universe, it's gonna be weird.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I would love to know as well!

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

I pronounce it da-eh-mon in my head, it sounds more old-timey than "dee-mon".

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how this one survived 400 years though...

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Considering the painbows a flaming wind doesn't sound impossible

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Ah, my bad then.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... what you said is correct, but that's superposition, not entanglement. Entanglement is when you create a product state of several qubits that cannot be decomposed into a tensor product of basic states (a single proton/photon/whatever).

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Oh yeah, that. My bad, mixed 'em up.

The original algorithm doesn't use entanglement, though! Just the fact that measurements can change the state. You can pick an axis to measure a quantum state in. If you pick two axes that are diagonal to each other, measuring a state in the "wrong" axis can give a random result (the first time), whereas the "right" one always gives the original data.

So the trick is to have the sender encode their bits into a randomly-picked axis per bit (the quantum states), send the states over, and then the receiver decodes them along a random axis as well. On average, half the axes will match up and those bits will correspond. The other bits are junk (random). They then tell each other the random axes they picked, which identifies the right bits!

They can compare a certain amount of their "correct" bits: if there's an eavesdropper, they must have measured in the wrong state half the time (on average). Measurement changes the state into its own axis, so the receiver gets a random bit instead of the right one half the time. 25% of the time, the bits mismatch, when they should always correspond.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (9 children)

You can have post-quantum cryptography using classical computation, though

("Simply" pick a problem with no quantum acceleration. I think Elliptic Curves Cryptography works, but I'm not an expert)

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Oh man I'd love to see more of alt-universe hexsquad

view more: ‹ prev next ›