Repeated1642

joined 1 year ago
[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok. Do you believe in DRS? So just DRS your shares, block the shills and keep with your life.
"You can lead a horse to the water but you can't make it drink."

Did you found any relevant and verfied contend? Plz share with us.
Do you have any question you'd like to ask others? Just ask, I am sure there are plenty of ppl here ready to help you.

Ok, let's be honest. You, me and all others got on this play about MOSS. I didn't give a flying fuck about GME before DFV. I got on the FOMO train as all of you. We are all on the Red, except a few that got on board recently. We all want to be right, but right now is not about MOSS anymore. It's about recovering the losses. Don't came with the potential until you sell shit. I did invested what I can aford to lose but boy does it hurts? Da fuck it does.
Did anyone forced me to get here? Absolutly not.100% my responsability.

[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Could you point me to an example of fhe anti-GME rhetoric here on Fedi? And if they are why don't you just block them? Also Who is the "people" you refer on your post? Honestly I don't understand the purpose of your post. Are you looking validation for your believes/actions? You were correct about this quarter numbers, Good. So do I. But hey, little secret, retail has no more money left to keep buying and DRS as we saw in the beginning. If you have any New content you want to discuss plz feel to share here.

PS: You do wathever you want but stop screming Shills to anything that doesnt align with your views.

I like your positivity and its very likely but I need to see the numbers first, hence i am still holding.

Wouldn't be suprised they are on @spez tech bro wanna be payslip. reddit is dead

[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actualy thats a fact that if you have shorted it in the last two years you'd be profitable. Lets stick to the facts. Plz don't bring the cult echo chamber here. For that there is already reddit. Yes I am long on GME, and yes I am deep on the red.

[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are better than expected but not beyond amazing. Still on the red, and must be sustainable. But seems to be on the right path.

Would you mind explain better why do you think ppl is throwing away money?
I must agree that stock performance hasnt been any good in the last two years and doesn't look promissing.
Yes shorting would have been profitable. But hey after the fact it's easy to look back state that. Just for curiosity, what stocks/sectors would you say are a good investment right now?

It's been a shit show lately. No DD, no critical thinking allowed, just an echo chamber.

Good point. But curious why did he decide to come out after being radio silent for quite long time and get involved in Apple's war specialy given that he is now CEO of a public traded company. Trying to capitalize by siding with common people? His personal opinion? Who knows!

[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't say there was not but I won't spend much time looking for hiden messages.

[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This. I still believe his tweets are just his opinion . No hidden messages or cryptic. Perhaps some private jokes, but nothing else.

[–] Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This. I've been saying and seeing it since Covid. Offices are half empty. Main street footfall is shrinking. These zones are high premiun rents, owned by REITs and other comercial founds. If they are not occupied and ppl is not consuming on the next door shops, assets value is gone down. More colateral is going to be asked from their lenders. Also, municipalities don't want to lose population as this can result on less budget from government.. Of course they are going to put pressure on their CEO buddies to have spenders back to office.

view more: next ›