Peddlephile

joined 1 year ago
[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Would you believe an idiot though?

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

When it becomes really advanced (we could even do it now, actually), we replace all upper management jobs and leaving human work to human workers, e.g. customer service, healthcare, arts and culture etc.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As long as they're getting paid well to do a job they want to do and have breaks, I don't see the problem. It's a job and in this capitalist world, bills have to be paid somehow. Pretty low effort way to earn some money.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

I thought that was the joke.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago
[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

So I just found out my local Maribyrnong councillor has died of unknown causes in her home. This is quite shocking.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Are you familiar with the bartering system? Rather than money, you would judge the value of the object by how much you needed it. If you really wanted the avocados, you would ask the person who had avocados what they would trade. If you didn't have what they wanted, you can bargain or try someone else who has avocados who wants what you currently have.

Basically, a money less society goes back to a very simplified society. You won't be able to get everything you want and will have to, sometimes, settle for what you currently have. It also gives you the ability to trade your skills.

So, you go back to the avocado trader and tell them that you'll build an avocado shed for them in exchange for a crate of avocados. You both negotiate, exchange and then move on.

It's more work because you have seized the means of production by making things yourself in order to trade, rather than off shoring to someone else who is likely not getting paid at all. This is why the wealthy absolutely don't want this system because it's more work for them, while in the lower class it'll give more control back. When balancing, there will always be people who lose and people who gain.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It was meant to be pedalphile, as in bicycle pedals, but I obviously mispelled it and I've chosen to stick with the name to constantly shame myself.

It was either that or spokesperson and I didn't think that was clever enough. Ironically, I've ended up looking very stupid and I'm fine with that.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm having a pretty good day today. I hope everyone here has at least one moment of joy today.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

One deluxe seafood curry with hot tea, please.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Oh, is this why they want to ban porn? "Every sperm is scared" sort of thing?

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Blue ringed octopus. Tiny but deadly.

 

I made this mini game as a way to process my absolute frustration of my local government favouring car transport and on street car parking, as well as almost getting run over by impatient drivers and cars parked in the cycling lane. I thought everyone here might enjoy it. It should run in your browser.

Cycling is a valid form of transport. It's not just a hobby.

 

And we had a community feedback session on active transport accessibility last year which highlighted some key roads that could adopt bike lane infrastructure. One of these roads is scheduled for an upgrade but no allowance for bike lanes was considered.

The road was considered a danger to vehicles because of pot holes, not because there's barely any room to drive in a two way street. Forget cycling; there is no room to even squeeze between parked vehicles and moving cars, and a lot of them have a murderous attitude to cyclists.

We have 3 counsellors for a bike lane, and 3 against (citing exceeding budget, safety and accessibility concerns regarding loss of on street parking). There was a swinging counsellor who initially voted for the bike lane in one meeting, but then ultimately voted against in the next meeting because the bike lane went against the council code of conduct (going against majority of the resident's wishes to keep on street parking).

I'm just frustrated... My area is so anti everything except for cars, and it's so close to public transport and the city (less than 6kms). It's actually ripe for some decent active transport infrastructure but unfortunately cycling, for some reason, is seen as a 'rich' person's activity even though their super utes cost waaaaaaay more than what most people can afford.

At the last council meeting, there was so much hostility from the car owners, saying that getting rid of on street parking for cycling infrastructure was a waste of money, would stop deliveries and maintenance vehicles, and creates an unsafe environment where you'd have to walk 500m in the dark to your car. Any time cycling was mentioned, they'd yawn loudly or shout their opinions.

My local council has also declared 'a climate emergency' but actively working against cycling treating it like a hobby, rather than a legitimate form of transport. Stop the world, I want to get off.

Rant over.

view more: next ›