Numberone

joined 1 year ago
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

Best and brightest..

[–] Numberone@startrek.website -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Nothing creepy about that hug...these old fucks can't help themselves can they.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

OP is a troll for saying go vegan on an animal cruelty thread huh?...ok...

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago

I had a morning pee, FOR THE GLORY OF THE KLINGON EMPIRE!

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate on this? I've always thought that housing is an absolutely terrible "store of value". Given the fact that appreciation at a population level, by definition means housing will be less affordable for the next generation. How is value for one generation balanced against subsequent ones. Also, it's an incredibly inefficient way to build a nest egg or whatever. If you pay a mortgage like most people do, over 15-30 yrs, you're paying something on the level of 150%-200% of its value over time. It seems to me a more rational way to build value is to keep housing costs low, allowing people to invest that difference (mortgage interest) into either investments or savings, rather than paying it to a bank.

I get that the US doesn't really have a culture of saving, but I feel like this is rationalized by the "my house will be more valuable when I retire" crowd. It's so easy to save now, with efficient investment products broadly available to individuals. Maybe it's time to let the house as the bulk of your wealth go, and make housing affordable again.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 13 points 6 months ago

First TNG watch throughl, she was And impediment to s02 crusher. But as I've watched repeatedly, she was a great character who made her presence known. She wasn't perfect, but she was interesting and she changed as the season went on wrt Data. I still think she was a eagerly underrated character.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 16 points 6 months ago

So hot, equally baffled.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago

Pigs are the same everywhere

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah maybe the problem is no one is describing what "work" means in this case. The goal is to reduce Chinese market share in the US EV market, protection of US industry ( lets be honest, probably the owners' income stream). I don't see that goal failing being likely.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 8 points 6 months ago (7 children)

See this makes sense to me. In good faith I don't understand how tariffs couldn't work. I mean, even if it doesn't STOP import of Chinese EV's, the uptake would be so much less than if they were 50% off....right?

History is rife with examples of countries developing their own industries by making imports more expensive.

view more: ‹ prev next ›