NathanielThomas

joined 1 year ago
[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Could be a very deferent version of the German-language learning video series "Nico's Weg"

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I've never heard of ricing but come to think of it I have heard of "rice rocket" to describe Kawasaki motor bikes so that's probably a titch racist.

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

There's always going to be meganerds who find insane builds in games.

I remember in Divinity Original Sin 2 I was at the final boss and it was stupid hard. So I went online to ask for help in Reddit and minmax nerds were like: Do you have skin graft? Do you have Green Tea? Do you have Adrenaline?

And sure enough, after respeccing the fight was a joke.

Of course, you can just beat DoS2 with barrelmancy, the most OP skill of all!

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I still call anyone who is infatuated with a topic of interest a nerd, but usually tongue in cheek because the likelihood is I'm also interested

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of interest, in Canada's 2011 federal election the Conservative party with Stephen Harper won by painting Michael Ignatieff as a book nerd professor from Harvard University.

They ran ads with taglines such as "Just visiting," "Just in it for himself," and, most notoriously, "He Didn't Come Back For You." These all suggested he was an erudite professor from the USA who wanted to run Canada for his own self-aggrandizement and mocked his intelligence and academic bona fides.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTnjFyIbcCw

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

They are among the best at it, you have to admit

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry to hear that you went through that.

In a perfect world I could have had an amicable divorce from my ex and everybody could have stayed in touch and been happy.

Instead I had a "Michael Bay" divorce where everything went really explosive and badly. It's sad because I see a lot of example -- such as our own prime minister -- who have a great divorce where everybody is respectful and mature and life goes happily on.

I've tried to explain to my dad how screwed up it is that he maintains a relationship with my ex despite my zero contact with my kids but he doesn't care. Actually, he went to my exes wedding with her new husband last month, which involved him flying to my city. He didn't visit me, which is really the extra cherry on the shit sundae.

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

In "theory" or "legally" I have 50-50 custody. In practice, it's nearly impossible to enforce visitation with older children. My kids were 15 and 9 when we split. Immediately, the courts said enforcement on the 15-year-old was impossible. I spent a few years battling enforcement on the 9-year-old but she soon also became unenforceable. At a certain point you can't win if the kids also don't want to see you or make your visit a nightmare by passively resisting.

I was in the middle of one of these court battles when my daughter became anorexic and told the medical staff she didn't want me to visit her in hospital. She was about 13 and that was the last I saw her.

Legally, I am a 50-50 parent but in reality the only thing I'm entitled to do is pay their mother $1,000 a month.

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh I'm fine with him seeing his grandkids but he has no empathy for my situation, considering it a dispute between myself and my ex. He even shares details from his trips to see them, as though that wouldn't hurt me to hear about it. His lack of empathy is the problem.

My mother, on the other hand, criticized my ex for the situation and was "cut off." So, despite the fact I'm sad that my mother can't see her grandkids because she, unlike my dad, did take sides, I feel like she had the empathy to stick up for her son and point out it the situation isn't right.

I will also mention my brother was "cut off" because of his close associations with me.

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

I feel this is highly inaccurate because it would imply these faults are on the slave and not on the system. It's not about the job, it's about the slavery itself.

I found through personal experience that the prestigiousness of the job is highly irrelevant; it's the working that sucks. It's the mandatory devotion to literally anything that sucks one's soul from one's body. And yes, that does become repetitive, and leads to some of the symptoms described above.

But much of the above list are based on factors that are forced upon all of us:

  • Working, for no explicable reason in a modern society where we are grotesquely wealthy and have a surfeit of everything
  • Commuting, a pointless and punishing exercise, often in transportation systems that are lazily thought of and constructed, mostly for cars and not human beings
  • Exhaustion, mental and physical, from the toil of slavery, preventing the inspiration of new activities and hobbies
  • Having to fake one's personality at work in order to conform to a social order so that one can participate in a capitalistic society one doesn't even want any part of
  • Uses substances to cope with trauma, such as coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, or drugs
  • Is too tired on the weekends, using them to recover from the cycle of work
  • Mental illness from trauma, unresolved because of a lack of health care funding for mental health, leads him to consider extreme options

It's about the system, not the slaves.

[–] NathanielThomas@lemmy.ca 178 points 1 year ago (28 children)

Interesting perspective. It would be really mind-blowing to see the other side of the gender, even though I have no interest in being trans.

One thing I will add to this article is that men are also viewed as little more than bank machines after divorce. People always have the utmost sympathy for any mother who is separated from her children, even if only for a few days. Movie plots can revolve around mothers finding their lost children and being reunited. But for men? We're only the providers, the ones who pay the child support.

I lost my kids (not legally, just boring old classic parental alienation) six years ago following the divorce. Nobody cares, because I'm just a man. Not even my own father cares. He happily continues to see his grandkids because he doesn't want to "take sides." None of my cousins or other parts of my family care either. So long as I'm paying my "support." And I can't complain about it on social media because I'm a man. I'm a stoic. Boys don't cry, remember?

The lack of emotional support for men mentioned in the article is another thing that really exacerbates divorces and leads to suicides. I do feel like if I were the type of person to contemplate suicide (I'm not), I would have definitely done it when my ex took my kids from me. And there would have been no male friends to pull me back from the edge. Those friendships are, to quote the author, superficial to a large degree, or even the ones that aren't are men who are now focused heavily on their own families and wives.

I mean, it's also true all the other stuff about the male privilege and feeling safe and the good things that come with being a man. But it's nice to see the perspective of how we lack emotional support and we're expected to grit our teeth and "walk it off."

view more: next ›