no it doesn't. it only says the weights an information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.
Masterkraft0r
this is the attack on stallman
seems prett damning to me
also i'm going to let devault himself rebut this
also no: stallman being under attack for credible accusations and even non-retracted public statements is not an "attack on free software" but a much needed clean up. call it a refactoring of legacy assets, if you want.
In austrian german dialect, "Mit da Ua, draht ma zua." which in standard german would be "Mit der Uhr, dreht man zu." and in english "With the clock, turn it closed." or something like that.
You are nearly there... If 40% of any group are anything, that is not an individual problem, it's a systemic issue.
BUT IT'S A SINGLE BINARY! UNACCEPTBLE!!!! THE BLOAT OF IT ALL!
it was a joke xD i like busybox (and systemd) i don't particularly subscribe to the unix way, but to each their own ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"Noooooooo! One tool should do one thing and one thing only! Blasphemy! Heresy! Anthema! Systemd!" crying in unix design philosophy
yup they do be doing that. never actually heard one myself irl but it's probably the most otherworldly bird call (or actually animal call period) i know. there's other weird ones (look up three-wattled bell bird) but nothing compares to the fucking barn owl.
barn owl
this is about type 1 diabetes, and i'm assuming you're talking about type 2
cackles in firefox...
that's your interpeetation. what's missing for me is "must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable". with this wording i could just say: "this data is not obtainable" and be done with it.