Maeve

joined 1 month ago
[–] Maeve@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Plus the employees and customers could enjoy the fruit. Free fruit already gathered may entice more customers for other things. I guess food stores may not like the idea.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the BLM lied about the (Cliven and sons) Bundy cattle degrading US property? No, I don't sympathize with them, just saying the answer may be somewhere between each extreme. Key word: "may," because I'm not a conservation scientist and people are people.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How do they handle that?

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hear me out; hire a few more municipal employees, care for the trees/pick the fruit, place in "blessing boxes" in public spaces, post office, library, DMV, tax office, town/city hall, worship venues etc? Employees can take what they need too?

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

Surveillance society is a bad idea, period.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

About the time some billionaire/politician/LEO/judge out other influential/affluent person is recorded in a compromising position.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What happens when QR codes are obsolete because some newer, smaller technology is in place?

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Iirc, there were 11? Saudis on that plane, 2 Iraqis. When planes were grounded and couldn't fly into or out of the USA, the Saudi royalty and entouragewere allowed to fly out. Then there was Bandi Bush.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social -3 points 1 month ago

Please dm me the mod-removed link.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

What are typhoons?

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

I was wondering if this came before or after sharpiegate.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 16 points 1 month ago

, in my case, the U.S. government asserted a dangerous, dangerous new global legal position. Only U.S. citizens have free speech rights. Europeans and other nationalities do not have free speech rights, but the U.S. claims its Espionage Act still applies to them, regardless of where they are. So Europeans in Europe must obey the U.S. secrecy law with no defenses at all.

On what planet does that sound less than completely sociopathic?

Also I had no idea Barr was ex CIA. It explains a lot and contradicts a lot. I'm very confused by Barr.

view more: ‹ prev next ›