Evinceo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago

Yudkowsky is in fact the nimrod from less wrong. Currently doing a fedora'd chicken little podcast tour.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think people should go to jail because they want to get high. But, separately, taking a pill, especially timed release, shouldn't be getting you high, and the people who need adhd meds to function I know certainly don't act like they're experiencing euphoria.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They give programming advice just like they give drug advice, the consequences are just different.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

As the rare person who is both fully convinced that ADHD is real/treated successfully with stims but who also has decided not to use them anymore, I feel called out.

This article is overly long and not sufficiently informed by the history of stimulant use and ADHD diagnosis, and instead tries to derive history from first principles. I read it a long time ago and I ain't reading it again because fuck that.

If you want a good accounting of the 'what if we're overdiagnosing ADHD' argument, ADHD nation is much better researched than Scott's post, and dives into the history of ADHD as a diagnosis and the era of stimulant use before it was as tightly controlled a substance. l don't endorse it's conclusions, but if you want a background on the topic, it's better than whatever this is.

There's a schism in the online disability rights community between people who favor an extreme flavor of the social model (somewhat advocated in Scott's 'man was not made to program or account' argument) and people who are very adamant that they have an intrinsic disability which must be medicalized.

I think both are a symptom of just how common the diagnosis is and what a wide swath of human behavior it covers, but I'm not sure that's all. My sibling and I both have an ADHD dx and scrip; my sibling still takes it and is basically non-functional without it; I have instead adapted my life to avoid a total lack of executive function creating too many issues.* I do not require stimulants to program for hours, but my sibling has difficulty focusing even with the aid of stimulants. I was diagnosed earlier because I was a rambunctious boy and she was a girl so when she couldn't focus on math class, the way she tells it, they just shrugged and assumed she was bad at math.

  • Posting a lot notwithstanding
[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Part of the point of these ideal cities is you get you set up your own system of low taxes, privatized everything, and no democratic control of the city. Libertarian fever dream, like seasteading.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

brown goo scenario

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 13 points 1 year ago

I have it on good authority that sentient lab grown meat already exists in the wild, in fact it is the host of a successful podcast.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, if distributed computing worked as well as singulatarians fear everyone would be using Beowulf clusters for their workloads instead of AWS.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 10 points 1 year ago

I actually work on the architecture for current production AI systems and whenever I mention approaches that do work fine and suggest we could control more powerful AI this way, I get downvoted.

LW isn't looking for technical practical solutions. They want plausible sci-fi that fits their narrative. Actually solving the problems they worry about would mean there's no reason for the cult to exist, so why would they upvote that?

Overall LW seems to be dead wrong about predicting modern AI systems. They anticipated that there was this general intelligence quality that would enable problem solving, escape, instrumental convergence, etc. However what ended up working was approximating functions really hard. The existence of ChatGPT without a singularity is a crisis for LW. No longer can they safely pontificate and write Harry Potter/The Culture fanfiction; now they must confront the practical reality of the monsters under their bed looking an awful lot more like dust bunnies.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe we could make an explicit sub-lemmy for indulging in maladaptive debating. It's my guilty pleasure.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Look more carefully at what the cult leader is asking for. He was asking for money for his project before, now he's tearing his hair out in despair because we haven't spent enough money on his project, we'd better tell the aliens to give us another few months so we can spend more money on the cult project.

He has been very careful not to say that we should do anything bad to the aliens, just people who don't agree with him about how we should talk to the aliens.

view more: ‹ prev next ›