DecarbonatedOdes

joined 1 year ago
[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one -1 points 9 months ago

The fact @auk made that mistake twice is certainly telling.

 

Hypothetically, if one were to seize the assets of, say a billionaire, what would that look like? Obviously, most of these forms are non-liquid. I'm looking for a purely financial perspective. Thanks.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

That could be true. I'm only repeating what I heard en mass during the Occupy Protests of the perceived reason of failure.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Definitely one of those ideas that would 100% work in theory but never in practice. The concept of "voting with your dollar" is still a powerful tool because it doesn't need to be complete, just enough to hurt the industry.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago

Great answer. I'm getting strong Thoreau Civil Disobedience vibes.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wait, who is deleting posts? Edit: Nevermind, it's the lemmy.world mods.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So true. And a national change in perspective is definitely achievable.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago

Thank you for a thought-out response.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Since force is a clear crowd favorite: What would that look like? Angry mod surrounds home of billionaire and guillotines them on their lawn? According to Forbes there are currently 735 billionaires. That might take some time.

[–] DecarbonatedOdes@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Wouldn't the wealth necessarily just be distributed to their heirs?

 

There are a myriad of news articles here on Lemmy that display the abhorrent influence billionaires have on our society (especially the US, where I reside). I consistently read comments where the posters appear hopeless and despondent of the situation, while others jokingly refer to the guillotine.

As for myself, I have recently found myself with a lot of free time on my hands after being laid off and want to gather ideas on what would be the best hypothetical route to solve this issue. Let me be clear: These are only THEORETICAL IDEAS and I do not condone any illegal activity.

Historical precedent: While I am not intimately familiar with the inner workings of the Occupy Movement, I do know that they were constantly attacked as being unorganized and lacking structure. It would be wise to not fall into the same pitfalls if those were accurate assessments.

Logical formulation: The foundations of the key points of the movement must be logically sound to withstand any external (and internal for that matter) scrutiny.

Motto: If a motto or slogan is chosen, it must be unambiguous so that attacks are directed to the movement, not the motto itself.

I am also aware that most people can't spare any time to these kind of movements. Similar to the Texas seceding news, many commentators have noted that most Texans are living paycheck to paycheck and wouldn't be able to dedicate any time to their cause. I would understand that would be same for this cause as well. However, since I have the time right now, I only ask for your ideas.

Broad issues: High cost of living (mortgages, rent, groceries, etc.) Inflation Homelessness

Philosophical underpinnings: Is there a Threshold of Greed? If so, what is too much wealth?

Possible means of reductions: Voluntary donation or renunciation of wealth past a certain point (highly unlikely) Taxation (also unlikely) Seizing assets (illegal and would most likely set a poor precedent)

It might also to organize an open database of billionaires with their respective fields (Forbes is closed) to help organize a boycott of some sort Though I suspect their fingers are in everything and it would be highly impractical.

Sorry for the word diarrhea. What are your thoughts?