Bongo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Some TO-92 like package. Maybe nice expensive foil dudes.

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Thanks!

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Dad? Is that you? Get off the Internet, it’s not for old people.

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, only one pic attached. Here’s the other

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We were together for 14 years. They were serious partners in crime. We’ve started to rebuild the herd with a new rescue - Guillermo

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My former co-idiots. And by co I mean with me added to that list

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Cool thank you very much

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Could you let us know who did the caps and maybe give us a closeup or two for quality assessment?

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ufda. Growing pains. I hope it resolves for you soon…

[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Bongo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I’m a very old school computer graphic guy, 1980 onward. I can tell you that the same was said about computer graphics in general. It was considered even ‘less’ artistic than photography. But then, food for thought, one of the primary goals of computer graphics was to create ‘photorealistic’ images. Just like painting in the 60s and 70s. So everyone was imitating everyone.

A sculpture professor once dismissed some of my students’ art as being ‘as simple as pressing a button’.

It’s all art. None of it is lazy. Even lazy art is sometimes intentionally so.

view more: next ›