this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
552 points (94.7% liked)

News

23367 readers
4380 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X on the day the new legislation came into force.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 217 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I am so fucking sick of these bigots pretending the science of "biological sex" is on their side.

In recent years, multiple studies of the brains of trans people have revealed areas of differentiation from those of cisgender people. And unless these bigots are prepared to argue that brains are not part of biology, they only have two choices: Deny the science somehow or accept that they're just bigots who want to hate, regardless of the science.

And because unlike bigots, I like to back my shit up:

On top of that, there's some indications of oligogenic causes resulting in various allele differences that wouldn't necessarily show up on a brain scan.

In conclusion: Fuck bigots and their attempts to co-opt science in order to support their bigotry.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

Deny the science

Sure thing Bob, let me just stack that in-between "Evolution" and "climate change" on my shelf of "Things that don't fit my bigoted, hateful, and selfish worldview, so I just conveniently ignore them."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 197 points 7 months ago (23 children)

OR, and hear me out, you could just not be a total asshole? Maybe have a baseline of tolerance and respect for the people who made you a billionaire? No? Then fuck right off and accept the consequences of your hatred.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 102 points 7 months ago (5 children)

It seems billionaires have really wacked out midlife crises. Instead of buying expensive cars and cheating on their partners, they come out as terfy nazis, build hate platforms, and crash companies. I mean to be fair, at this point the sample size is only two, JKKK Rowling and Musk, but it's still surprising that it'd happen twice.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 80 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Bill Gates started a charity.

Steve Jobs killed himself because he thought he knew better than his doctors. Well, that's wacked out too, but at least it's not being a Nazi...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (16 children)

Bill gates didn’t start the charity as a midlife crisis.

It’s a tax dodge and a lot of other ways of protecting his money while also doing a little reputation washing/ morality banking

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 118 points 7 months ago (26 children)

It's becoming harder and harder to be a Harry Potter fan nowaday.

I don't really understand what it is about X Formerly Known as Twitter that turns previously respectable people into, well, this.

Everybody should take a break from social media once in a while, it's better for your health.

[–] Shialac@lemmy.world 77 points 7 months ago (5 children)

It doesn't turn these people, they were shitty all the time, they just get a platform on X so it becomes visible

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Part of it is that having a large captive audience hanging on to your every word really starts to amplify toxic characteristics in those with the predisposition for shittiness. Like Musk or Trump, their descend only came when they became active on social media.

Twitter is a horrible thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They were always awful. They just needed a platform where they could blossom into the terrible people they always were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Oh yeah it was definitely Twitter that made her a bigot. She was an upstanding and progressive citizen before a website made her bad! /s

That's like saying "I don't really understand what it is about alcohol that makes people racist"

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If I remember correctly, it all started when she retweeted something that was a bit ignorant and was called out for it on Twitter, but then she kept doubling down until it got to this point, when she could have just stopped talking about it.

It's not that Twitter suddenly turned her into a bad person, but it definitely brought out the worst in her.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] kellyaster@lemmy.world 92 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Rowling quote from the article:

Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls.

It's difficult to accept that someone I used to respect could say such hateful things about people like me. I'm not gonna lie, it hurts to read. What the fuck, Joanne? Is that all I am to you... just a man "performing" my idea of femaleness? Well, fuck you, then. Should I wish for you to feel the same pain you've inflicted on others? To be honest, judging by your "performance" in the media the past several years, I don't think you're resilient enough to survive it.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

It sucks when your heros let you down. There was a guy I really admired and I worked with. When his wife was in the hospital he cheated on her. Couldn't see him the same way again.

Sorry she sucks so very hard and is not only a disappointment actively hostile.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] niva@discuss.tchncs.de 90 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (13 children)

This is mental illness by now! Seriously wtf? Why is this so important for her that she can't stop talking about it? If I had some irrational hate for trans woman, I would not go on about it in public all the time.

Don't we have more important problems then to bash people that are so unhappy with their body that they are willing to take hormones and let people operate on their genitals?

This is such a simple thought, everybody should be able to think it, right? But on the other hand, she is not the only one hating transgender women or men. I mean it is not right to hate people for that. But if I would hate trans people then I would just not invite them for dinner and would stop talking about them all the time.

It must be some form of mental illness I have no other explanation.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 74 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It’s not a crime to be an insufferable piece of shit. Usually. If they make an exception for her, okay then.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 66 points 7 months ago (7 children)

No, but it seems like "stirring up hate" is a crime. And, as a public figure who is publicly hateful, she potentially fits that description

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yep, there really needs to be the distinction between private remarks and public instigation in free speech law.

Otherwise you're not protecting anything except the right of the loudest to monopolize the airwaves via intimidation of dissent and "the other"

It's not freedom of speech unless everyone feels safe using it, be it from fear of retaliation by the state, or by the tyranny of cousins.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 66 points 7 months ago (12 children)

Why are some people so determined to be pieces of shit?

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You don't get rich being nice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 52 points 7 months ago (8 children)

If I had her money, I wouldn't spend my time bullying people and starting fights with the police. She's clearly insane in the most fundamental way.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 31 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The more I know about rich people, the less inclined I am to think that they're usually well adjusted.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that Scotland's freedom of speech laws are different from those in the US.

[–] hannes3120@feddit.de 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The freedom of one person ends where it starts limiting the freedom of another person

Unlimited freedom of speech just means that it's possible to verbally deny a group of people a place in society either by lying about them or by just ignoring their existence - and both are limiting that person's freedom - not just their freedom of speech.

I really don't understand how Americans don't seem to understand that one person's freedom should end when it limits the freedom of another person - and if it doesn't then it's just the stronger/more forceful one pushing the weaker/more defensive one into a corner.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 50 points 7 months ago

Trans people exist and deserve, like anyone, to be treated with dignity and respect. Get the fuck over it.

Ugh.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 49 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Her opinion on trans folks is shit, but people should not go to jail for shit opinions. Broken clock and stuff.

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 61 points 7 months ago (25 children)

It's more complicated than that. Like saying there is a fire in a theatre when there is none, saying transgender are undercover perverts and a danger to society when it's not supported by evidence will get people killed. Freedom of speech is great and all but when your lie and put people in danger there should be consequences.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

Have as many opinions as you want, but if you spread shit like "we should exterminate the lesser races" and "trans people are rapists" you earn a vacation at the greybar hotel for abusing your right of free speech to infringe on other people's rights.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (4 children)

People shouldn't go to jail for shit opinions, I agree. That changes when their opinions become more than opinions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (4 children)

She grossly misinterprets what the law is meant to achieve. It's not for somebody who dead names a trans person or calls a trans woman he or him. It's when someone Tweets out "Who will rid me of this troublesome trans person?" and then their one or more of their followers goes out and beats or murders that person.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Lots of people just don't know what freedom is speech actually means. Speech isn't a crime, but crimes can be committed by speaking.

If you kill someone with a hammer, you aren't charged with possession of hammer - you're charged with murder. If you hire a hitman to do the killing instead, you aren't charged with "using speech."

When that theoretical person is arrested for "shouting fire in a crowded theatre" they aren't actually being arrested for their speech or their words, but for a separate crime that uses speech as a mechanism.

Speech is a marvelous thing that should be protected, but freedom of speech is not freedom from the consequences of using speech to commit other crimes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Hateful ideas can be dangerous things. This is why insulting people in Germany can turn into a criminal offense. They know where that goes if left unchecked.

Also, remember, not every country is the USA where breaking the law = going to jail. It can just be a fine the first few times and jail only when you show no intent on ceasing what you're doing.

JKR is being hyperbolic with this "arrest me" thing. She's playing the victim for her TERF followers.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (39 children)

You can weaponize an opinion, that is what is getting punished.

load more comments (39 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RatBin@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

People who use biology as an excuse to hate on people have no grasp on how biology even works. You should know that gender disphoria, gender transitions and other genders as well come in fact with small noticeable differences, such as the way the brain is wired and even the many mechanisms inside your body. Unfortunately, such differences are not noticeable right off the bat. But they exist. Also FFS, she could have just enjoyed her harry potter money, maybe she could go silent after the first tweet but come on! There'se no reason to go any further, no reason. She now dwells with the likes of her conservative friends - She's no victim. There's more money there than many of us could see in a lifetime. She actually has too much -

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Wayren@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Can we just hold one big public figure accountable to the law? Please?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I live in Canada where we have hate crime laws, they don't affect 99% of us in any way, because 99% of us aren't walking around calling for the death of groups of people, based on race, gender, etc. Hate crime laws only affect the people who are truly beyond hateful. Nobody is gonna arrest you for being an anti trans asshole, but that will if you start inciting violence or calling for blood

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism

That's a particularly odd way for the BBC to characterize her behavior.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because the BBC is also a "critic of some trans activism". They actually have a Mastodon instance that immediately got defederated by a few other instances due to their transphobia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brotkel@programming.dev 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Scotland was literally willing to leave the UK over this. I wouldn’t be putting money on Joanne to come out on top here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

Ironic: She tried to insert herself as Hermoine/McGonagall, but she really was Umbridge all along.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I’m always confused by people that are willing to tank their body of work and public image in order to yell on a soapbox for culture war bullshit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

I'm glad that Harry Potter wasn't my favourite series growing up, knowing how bad of a person she is. With that said, it's still possible to separate the art from the artist, so it's okay either way but personally I just feel better knowing it wasn't my number one favourite series growing up.

[–] saintshenanigans@programming.dev 26 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I think the general argument against separating the art from the artist is that shes still alive and when we buy HP products, she gets that money and uses it to harm trans people.

Hp lovecraft iirc is known as a racist, but we can still purchase his books without funding him cause he's dead.

Buy your HP merch secondhand, i guess?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

“Am I being detained!?!?!?”

–JK Rowling

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I look forward to the pending arrest video, where she is suddenly all apologetic and saying sorry, and not understanding why they won't let her go because she just said sorry to them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›