Technology

1441 readers

986 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

Boom’s first test flight could signal the return of supersonic air travel (www.theverge.com)

submitted 8 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Could supersonic air travel make a comeback?

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Technofrood 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean as much as I like the Concorde, I really don't see commercial supersonic flights being a major success, it might be of some use on certain long fight routes that are mostly over water.

But it's going to have the same problems that were the nails in the coffin for Concorde, too noisy to fly over populated areas, high running/maintenance costs, low passenger capacity and reasonably small market.

Given the rise of the internet there's even less need to just pop over to the US and back for the day which was some of the market for Concorde. The environmental impact of a commercial supersonic aircraft would also be under significant pressure. A lot of the current improvement in jet engines for commercial flight has been how to make them more efficient.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

As someone with an interest in the technology involved in this stuff: it’s a LOT more viable today than it was 60 years ago. Today, you have:

extremely advanced composites, ceramics, and metallurgy
extremely advanced construction techniques, including bespoke additive, subtractive, and planar deformation
incredibly detailed computer simulation in various domains to enable rapid iteration and perfection of components
60 years of research into jet engine energy and noise efficiency
60 years of research into supercruise
recent advances in combined cycle, geared turbines, and rotational detonation engines - not to mention, theoretical advances in the future around electric, hydrogen, and fusion-powered concepts
recent flight research around suppressing noise during supersonic flight (QSST)

There is a TON of technology and innovation that’s coming together recently to make supersonic transport an actual viable thing. For the record, it wasn’t a viable thing when the Concorde was doing it. That was basically a national pride project between the UK and France.