this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
-8 points (21.4% liked)

The Agora

1598 readers
1 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have seen many a democratic initiative ruined by trolls, bot accounts, duplicate accounts, and assholes. The best way to ensure that democracy doesn't spiral into Haiti is to allow only financial contributors of $5 or more to vote (once the boss man has his contributions system up and running). You want to help build this community? OK, then put your money where your mouth is. To be clear, it should still be one vote per person, whether you donate $5 or $500.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fantastic idea, money being involved in democracy has always worked out to benefit the average person.

Fuck the poors, they should have no voice in our community. What, you can't afford the price of a cup-a-coffee? Begon.

First vote afterwards? This is now a paid instance. I don't even want to see those plebs.

True democracy. Only ~~land owners~~ paying members^tm^ can vote

aye

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I would like to add a second level of financial support to allow downvotes, say $10, an invisible downvote for $20, and a special Gold Star vote that you can buy individually which is also worth ten upvotes. Of course, if we implement Gold Stars I would like a FullOfShit award as well and a SilentButDeadly award which isn't shown but resets the counter to -1 any time the vote would otherwise go positive.

Let make kbin a place just like the real world - where money buys influence!

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your vote will count as an approval even if you were clearly sarcastic.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll pay you twelve dollars for the rights to your vote

[–] earthling@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As it stands, you could just create another account for $0 rather than paying for their vote. In fact, you could create a whole lot of them.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a good point. There are other solutions though that are less destructive. We could have timed verification, "karma" limits, lock it behind an application, only select participants, or only community mods which would lower the amount of false voters. Non of these are perfect, but neither is the donation gate.

To echo myself in another comment:

There are countless ways to trick that system and the trolls will be more dedicated than the average user. If someone really wants it a hundred bucks isn’t that hard to get, or to “find”. Especially if crypto is an option. If it’s 5 bucks to vote permanently, then that’s 5 bucks per vote, permanently. A person with more money and more accounts will have outsized power in this community.

[this] selects a specific type of person too. As a dev, I understand how rare it is for a person to move into a paying role on a site.

This minority of the instances population on an already small group will be those who most want power, not the most invested. That’s what 5 dollars gets you. Power. This is a poor idea.

I understand your concern, but I disagree with the direction you'd take it. Only allowing paid users to vote creates a power inbalance and makes the more power hungry much more powerful, without really stopping them from making more accounts. Sure, it costs them more, but there will be much less competition to overcome.

[–] earthling@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want to be clear that I wasn't necessarily arguing for some type of paid option. Just that what we have now also isn't democracy.

Either would be a democracy, definitionally, though both are imperfect. I'd agree something needs to be done to fix the imperfections where possible

[–] daveuk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nay...optional donate to vote. I will be donating, but not everyone who deserves a vote will necessarily be.

[–] kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nay

Also wtf

The best way to ensure that democracy doesn’t spiral into Haiti

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nay - no paywalls. This server should survive because its a nice place, not because people pay money to have a day in its operation.

[–] hoi_polloi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nay, I feel there has to be some better way to go about it than paywalling it. Maybe based on account age and contribution.

[–] atkion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nay, this idea is fundamentally against the values of this instance.

[–] nemo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nay, This essentially turns this instance into an oligarchy. I don't think other instances are going to appreciate this type of governance either.

Also, nothing stops trolls and bad actors from donating the bare minimum a thousand times to get a thousand voices. This would mean a high minimum investment should be required, which further hurts the common user.

I believe that a shitty/troll opinion has an artificial majority, the real users will catch on and act accordingly, however we still have to see an example of this.

I'm also certain that privacy people would rather not risk money transfers, cash or whatever (crypto is a whole other discussion).

In short, I think requiring payment, or proof of identity, or any other de-anonymizing measures would hurt discussion by excluding genuine users, even if it allows more trolls that would be ignored/dealt with by genuine users.

[–] Sodeus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Anduck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Hagarashi8@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nay, paywalled democracy isn't democracy.

Nay

I don't want to associate my account with my money, and enforcing this would require that. I prefer to donate anonymously.

[–] Derproid@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nay, but I also get where you are coming from. Maybe alternatively have it be based on contributions? Like having at least x comments over the past y weeks. That way you only need to be an active member of the community.

[–] 9999monkeys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

yes, definitely. account age and activity are alternatives. but those can very easily be faked in larger communities. the only thing that shuts the trolls and bots down 100% is a fee. but everyone is unanimously voting against, i hope history proves me wrong