Only if they do it twice.
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
53 points (92.1% liked)
No Stupid Questions
35728 readers
1171 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Fool me... you can't get fooled again.
Apparently that quote was where a scriptwriter almost screwed Bush over.
The full phrase is "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." Bush realised he was about to give the media a sound bite of him saying "Shame on me".
Given the context, it's far more understandable why he flubbed it.
Kinda funny how its probably survived much longer because of the improvisation, but yeah, I get why you wouldn't want to say that.
That's an old saying in Tennessee... I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee...
This was Dubyah trying to quote the old saying that starts "fool me once, shame on you...". I used to think HE was dumb, now we have people in office that make him look like a Rhodes Scholar.
But what if... we don't get fooled again. Yeaaaaaah
The expressions "being fooled" and "being made a fool" have coexisted for a very long time.
at some point you have to trust something
I trust the floor of my bedroom to be there when I get up in the dark.
I trust my wife not to change the locks on the house when I'm out or not to murder me in my sleep
I trust my friends not to falsely accuse me of horrible crimes to the police
I trust the starbucks drive through is real and not a fake starbucks pretending to be starbucks
any one of these things could "fool" me at any time, doesn't mean I'm stupid.
however, what I never trust is that there is a secret to get ahead quickly. Whatever it is, it's always slow, expensive, with a lot of paperwork, requires practice and expertise, and will go wrong several times.
so if someone gave a hundred grand to someone who wasn't a known financial institution expecting a massive return on their investment with no paperwork, I would say they were foolish. If they were a close friend / relative, I'd commiserate and use kinder language to their face, something along the lines of they've got to take better care of themselves and their finances.- because I am a kind person. Some people believe in tough love. I believe such a concept is to be used very sparingly.
I trust the starbucks drive through is real and not a fake starbucks pretending to be starbucks
I trust the floor of my bedroom to be there when I get up in the dark.
Technically, you have an infinitesimally tiny but non-zero probability of experiencing a quantum tunnelling event at the macro scale that will have you drop through that floor without damaging it to land in the room below.
I'd say you're more likely to get a positive response if you use words like "deceived" or "conned" or "lied to" which place the fault on the deceiver.
"Fooled" isn't offensive per se; "chumped" is worse. But if I was wanting to convince someone that they had been maliciously given false information, I'd use language that doesn't raise hackles by implicitly blaming them for being deceived.
Edit: "Played for a fool" is more offensive IMO, because now you're pointing out that the victim has some exploitable flaw which allowed the deceiver to make a fool of them.
Edit again: Sorry for the double post. Something seems to be a little weird with my app.
I'd say you're more likely to get a positive response if you use words like "deceived" or "conned" or "lied to" which place the fault on the deceiver.
"Fooled" isn't offensive per se; "chumped" is worse. But if I was wanting to convince someone that they had been maliciously given false information, I'd use language that doesn't raise hackles by implicitly blaming them for being deceived.
I ate a salad, am I a vegetarian?
Most likely just a salatarian for now
Not necessarily (you may or may not) but you shouldn't be because Dairy is Scary (It's a joke calm down)
Oh I agree You do not want to know what dairy does to me! (And the people around me)
Fools are full of certainty. The wise are full of doubt.
100% agreed.
Fool is a spectrum. E.g. take the saying "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me". It's possible to fool anyone. Sometimes it's because they are a fool, but sometimes it's not.
IF you learn, THEN only temporarily.
IF you don't/won't learn, THEN you ARE a fool.
That is exactly what it means, yes. Though people will probably feel less happy if you point it out explicitly
Not necessarily, it means someone else was smarter than you, or exploited a weakness of yours, which might be your kind heart or your greed, rather than a lack of intelligence. Note: kindhearted people won't mind being told this but greedy people will mind. "Scammed" or "exploited" put the onus on the perpetrator. If you already said "played for a fool " and they took offense, consider adding some of these types of synonyms if you want to mend their feelings.