this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
65 points (94.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43816 readers
1031 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen a few posts about it, and have googled, but I get conflicting results, and haven't seen anything on tradmedia.

Would someone mind filling me in?

Thank you.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tharvey11@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is a new material that has been synthesized by South Korean physicists that, according to them, is superconductive at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.

This would be a collosal scientific breakthrough if it can be replicated and confirmed. Other superconding materials only work at extremely cold temperatures or high pressures, making them extremely expensive and/or difficult to produce as well as impractical for widescale use.

The material itself is a lead based crystal, with some of the lead atoms replaced with copper atoms. This creates internal strain in the material that allows quantum tunneling of electrons through the material, resulting in the low resistance.

Because of some recent alleged scientific misconduct of another physicist working in this field, the scientific community has been a bit skeptical of the claims thus far. The author's originally submitted their findings to the most prestigious journals (Science/Nature) but they were not published there until they could be corroborated and replicated due to the ongoing controversy of the other physicist.

However, unlike other superconducting technologies, this material is relatively cheap and easy to produce so there are many ongoing attempts to try to replicate the results and we should get clarity soon either way whether this is truly a society changing technology, or another "too good to be true" headline.

[–] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah I have stopped taking these headlines and hype seriously, we get such "discoveries" hyped up every couple of years. Obviously big if true but it's a damn big if.

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LK-99 is a potential room-temperature superconductor. The Wikipedia article has a good overview, including how attempts to replicate the findings have so far failed.

[–] Uprise42@artemis.camp 13 points 1 year ago

It should be noted that attempts may have failed due to poor definitions in the paper which make it more difficult to replicate on the first try. It means more testing will need to be done to truly know if it can be replicated.

But also, just today someone claimed to have replicated it at a Chinese university. Now, I’m not a physicist so I have no idea if the video is legit or not but it has a lot of professionals in the field talking so I think it carries some weight. It isn’t something to get excited about yet, but also don’t brush it off as a hoax either:

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/superconductor-breakthrough-replicated-twice

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Okay so batteries. When you push their abilities, they get hot. Why? They're not superconductors.

That heat is a problem at large scale.

Finding a reliable superconductor isn't impossible, but until recently finding one that can exist at ambient temperature and pressure has been impossible. Basically, preventing that heat problem has been impossible to achieve without seriously cold temps or seriously absurd pressures. Those conditions aren't great for large scale use on earth.

So, if this is legit, it's a big deal. The whole nature of power supply and consumption will become less problematic.

It is wild how many huge breakthroughs we are in the edge of. I'm not holding my breath, but this is... Huge.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

A Korean team claims it's a ambient temperature supra conductor (it's been 100 years that material physicists have been looking for one) . If true it's a major discovery. Remember December 2019 when we heard about a new virus in Wuhan?

However,

It has been published on arxiv, where scientists share draft paper before final publication (so you get early results without loosing 2 years in review) meaning it hasn't been peer reviewed. We talk about a major discovery, not about one more paper about quantum nanodots or a yet an algorithm to classify galaxies by shape using machine learning. In general, these ones are kept secret until publication and front page of a big journal.

To my understanding, on the recent development, one team couldn't reproduce their experiment while another concluded that theoretically speaking LK99 could be superconducting

So basically, the 3 options are

  • It's a it's a fraud (but why fraud with such a high buzz tittle?)

β€” Paper is over optimistic but LK99 has nice property and is a milestone on the way (but again why come with such a big claim?)

β€” It's really superconducting, and for some reasons they had to release an early preprint (may be another team was about to publish) which would be a major discovery