this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
82 points (86.6% liked)

Marvel Studios

3029 readers
54 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios!

We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about Marvel Studios productions. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Related Communities:


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 103 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I am not spending movie theater prices to give a movie a chance. That's why I only go once or twice a year for something that is guaranteed to be good.

[–] Hope@lemmy.world 73 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The title is pretty clickbaity, she's really commenting on people sharing opinions online about the movie without seeing it.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

That makes sense.

The Marvels is on my watch list, so I'll be giving it a try eventually. The slowness is more about Marvel stuff not being as entertaining for me as they used to be.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Same. I actually just watched it recently and didn't think it was bad. It may not have been great but I was entertained. I did also enjoy Ms. Marvel but I also think that actress just did a great job. Gave me early awkward Spider-Man discovering his powers coming of age vibes.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I watched it, I liked it. You don't need to have watched all the various shows beforehand, but you need to have a rough idea of who all 3 marvels are going into it.

But it was a good movie that dealt with some difficult topics and handled them pretty well. Iman Vellani is excellent in it.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

It kept me thoroughly entertained throughout, and that's all I ever ask from a superhero movie.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Exactly, especially for a movie that you know will be on Disney plus soon. It costs me 3x for a movie ticket than the price of monthly Disney+

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

I think the gist of the OP was that plenty of people were dunking on the movie without ever having actually seen it.

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I watched it on Disney plus and it was fine but I'd be pissed if I spent the £50-60 it would have cost at the cinema.

There's no way I'm spending money on something just to give it a chance if I'm already indifferent about it

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While I enjoyed it just fine that's also one of the problems they're facing:

I already have Disney+. Why would I go see it in a theater when I can wait to see it at home on a service I'm already paying for?

My own snacks, beer, and ability to pause will almost always beat having to leave the house and spend more money.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can bring snacks and beer into theaters if you're crafty enough. The real killer feature is pausing.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely easier in the winter, when nobody will look twice at a big coat.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The theater near me closed during covid, but previously they allowed outside food within reason. I'd done sushi or fried chicken a couple times before they shot down for good.

[–] PhreakyByNature 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

£50-60? Getting caviar snacks are we?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I don't know how theaters in the UK work, but here, for two people? $50 easy.

Imax tickets locally are $22, x2 = $44 and that's before popcorn and drinks.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you forced to watch it in IMAX or is it possible in simple screening rooms as well?

[–] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

18-22 before tax per ticket imax, 16 basic matinee. Doesn’t make a diff. it’s still expensive as all fuck, and the mouse has a 75% take thanks to them strong-arming theater chains.

Maybe if Disney lowered their take they could push more tickets and give theaters more room to breathe, but here we are.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Just looking at normal tickets at the local theater:

Kung Fu Panda 4 3D: $12 x2 = $24.

Love Lies Bleeding: $9 x2 = $18.

Dune 2: $14.75 x2 = $29.50.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Yeah I think the context of you buying tickets for 2 was missing from your first comment, but I completely agree.

[–] frazorth 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Odeon sells "all you can watch" tickets for £14 a month. £17 for the "all you can watch" with premium seats updates.

£8.50 for a single film. That's everything as we include all taxes.

Why are you comparing to IMAX? That's already accepting that you are going to be paying over the odds.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Because somebody was confused over how movie tickets could be $50?

I mean, don't even get me started if you have kids to take...

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Odeon sells "all you can watch" tickets for £14 a month. £17 for the "all you can watch" with premium seats updates.

These are only good if you are ghe kind of person who goes to the cinema allot. This isn't me. Even before covid I could count on 1 hand the number of times I went in a year.

Ironically the last 2 films I saw in a cinema was captain marvel and end game. Cap being a big reason why I was already indifferent.

[–] jaykay@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Even IMAX is £25 for two people. Idk where they got £50 from

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

2 tickets are nearly 40 on their own

[–] frazorth 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No they are not. 2 tickets at Odeon is £17.

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you want to get picky my nearest odeon is at least an £22 train ride away.

My local cinema is £18.50 each plus snacks

Edit.

It's also besides the point spending any amount of money vs just watching it at home would have annoyed me

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I really enjoyed The Marvels! I don't know why people are hating on it so much... It's much better than the last few stinkers Marvel put out lol

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think it was two things. First, there were a lot of people who were predisposed to hate it because they thought it was "woke" like the first Captain Marvel. You can't ignore the insidious undertones of a lot of critics, but that doesn't invalidate all of the criticisms.

It wasn't a great movie. None of the recent movies were great, but none were as bad as people made them out to be. Critics are just tired of Marvel movies. They have seen a lot of really bad superhero movies, and casual viewers don't know differentiate between Aquaman, Madam Web, and Love and Thunder. So when the latter isn't as good as Ragnarok, it's "just another bad comic book movie" adding to the fatigue.

So there exists a built-in set of anti-fans who feel validation when any of these movies is less than perfect. Deadpool will be fun, and then gird your loins for Captain America because that's going to be a chew toy for all of the worst people.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I liked the first marvel film but thought this one was awful. just from memory, the singing planet made me want to jam pencils in my ears. The antagonist was inexplicably as powerful as all 3 marvels (come on, carol alone went toe-to-toe with thanos). And then she just... blew herself up. So good job, I guess? And the whole b-plot on the SWORD station with Fury and Ms Marvel's family could have just been cut with nothing of value lost.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I agree the singing planet was the lowest point of the film. They could have left that out altogether, and it was the one moment in the movie where I audibly groaned lol I liked the rest of it pretty well though

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I agree. It was a solid movie, a lot better than the recent ones that struggled.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thats just it. Im fucking over Marvel.

It could be the best thing they have done since Thanos snapped his fingers and I still wouldnt give a fuck. Its just done for so many people at this point.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That finger-snap could have done away with half of the greenlit projects and everyone could have saved a lot of time.

[–] cel922@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago

I stopped going to nearly all movies at the cinema. I have a good-enough 5.2.1 sound system and large television with appropriate cinema seating distance, so why should I go out if all I need to do is wait 8-12 weeks and see it on a streaming subscription? For me, the movie would need to be compelling enough to warrant a drive of about 120 miles to see it in a Dolby Cinema theater, of which only Oppenheimer met in the past year.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 16 points 8 months ago

I thought it was about average for a Marvel film - which is good, because “about average” for many other franchises isn’t positive at all. Definitely doesn’t deserve the negativity.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

When these movies don't do well, why on earth do they keep asking the actors about it?

The actors didn't write a boring script. The actors didn't direct lackluster action sequences. The actors didn't hack together a pile of nonsense.

If you want to drag someone, at least drag the director.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 8 months ago

I do. But I do so when it's not gonna cost me anything.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, I understand wanting the movie you are starring in to do well, but all she is arguing is that people spent time and effort to make the movie and that people should watch it for that. Yeah well, that’s true for virtually every movie, or any work of art really.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

She's arguing that critics should watch it before they criticize it, out of respect for the people who spent time and effort to make it.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago

I can totally relate to that. I mean, to be in a big superhero move that you think is really good and see it not find a strong reception probably feels terrible.

It's not her fault. But from the movie trailers it looked badly constructed. I can't give two hours of my time for something I'm convinced is going to be a disappointment for me.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Saw it in the theater, bought the 4K disc for home... it's largely unobjectionable. It's fine. It's very safe. Doesn't really do much interesting. Some of the visual effects are pretty bad, but not as bad as, say Black Panther's big fight at the end.

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I enjoyed it more than Barbie, which was unexpected since I had high expectations for Barbie and none for the Marvels.