this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
74 points (98.7% liked)

Australia

3611 readers
117 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
74
Australians lose nearly $1 billion a year to card surcharges as RBA warns banks to stop (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 8 months ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/australia@aussie.zone
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Unlike in the UK and the European Union where card surcharges are banned, retailers in Australia are allowed to recoup their payment costs through surcharging their customers, as long as they are not making a profit out of it.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Australian Banks profit nearly $1 billion a year from card surcharges as RBA does nothing"

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think the banks see much of that money. It mostly goes to infrastructure companies such as Visa (who guarantees a refund if your card is stolen) and Telstra (network infrastructure isn't free) and of course the actual card processing hardware itself isn't fee either.

I would be curious to see how much money Australians save by not paying a million people to handle cash (which they generally do poorly).

[–] wscholermann@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

In any case, the RBA tut tutting will change precisely nothing.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 7 points 8 months ago

Card surcharges are just another way for retail outlets to gouge their customers with hidden cost.

Any honest business absorbs the cost of credit card fees because they know that the labour cost of banking cash or the transactional cost of EFTPOS is a rounding error.

Dishonest businesses who deal with cash under the table don’t account for the labour cost of banking cash, so just perceive as credit card fees as an extra expense.

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 6 points 8 months ago

so split across the big 4, say $250m each and $5-10b in profit each.. they can afford to stop

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it the merchants themselves who impose these 1.5% charges? I usually pay it, but it does annoy me.
While we're at it, let's get rid of the 'minimum purchase for card purchase' policies.

I should not be punished for putting the money straight into your account and saving you the hassle of constantly managing the till cash, counting takings at day's end and going to the bank.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago

Still have to do both, so if the bank is taking a cut, then I'm going to at least get a minimum sale out of the deal.

[–] jibbajabba@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

i dont get why it's a percentage... the database on the server thats on whether transactions are happening or not, the always on internet connection, doesnt cost more because i bought a pastry with my coffee today.. what the!?