this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
234 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
324 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ono@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Buying it with your money.

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Or drug money from selling to a foreign country

[–] gabe@literature.cafe 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How lovely, our tax dollars at work 🙄

[–] zakomo@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Why limit yourself to seized data from the US only if hosted in the US if you can buy data from all over the world. In some respects that is a very smart move, in some other is deplorable and arrogant.

[–] Recant@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It doesn't make sense while if this data, that would usually require a warrant if not already being sold, is allowed to be collected by companies.

Companies may argue that users consent to this in the terms and conditions of when they start using the product but what about those users that aren't a Google, Facebook or "insert tech corporation here" user? Those users never consented to data collection but their data is being collected just the same.

The issue is not the government buying this data. That is just a symptom of the root cause which is lack of consumer privacy laws.

[–] whelmer@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Indeed.

I'm afraid that even laws aren't the root cause. I'm pretty concerned about the infrastructure we have allowed to be built around us, and what we will continue to allow to be built going forward. Even if we had strong privacy laws, laws are fickle things. The only thing separating us from full on Orwellian dystopia is some bad policy changes, the technology is already in place and we bought it on purpose.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Is the only law regarding data protection in the US HIPPA? Just wondering...

It's just kindof funny that agencies can obtain information from companies that would normally require a warrant to get.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The parking lots in that photo of NSA HQ seems huge compared to the size of the building. How big are their basements? Where do all those people work?

[–] esty@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

american car dependency and minimum parking requirements, mostly

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

A video explanation of America's parking laws.

[–] BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dont those companies that collect your data always keep stressing how much they dont directly sell your data so third parties cant actually know its you?

[–] whelmer@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Amazon's Data Re-Identification Services now free with Amazon Prime!

[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

No surprise with their massive budget.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fine. I'm not important enough to pay attention to anyway. Pretty sure they'd be bored by my porn search history even.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saying you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I have nothing to say about this.