this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
394 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
4786 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 137 points 8 months ago (8 children)

There's only one country who has been running around doing this the past two decades. They've been confirmed to be in these areas, AND they have the capability.

Ladies and Gentlemen...RUSSIA!

You sad ass pieces of shit.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be honest I'd be surprised if this was Russia. It's certainly not outside of Russia's capabilities, but at the end of the day they're just cables. Plenty of the Red Sea is right next to Houthi-controlled territory and not all that deep. Something like this is commercially available and easily capable of reaching the floor of the area near the Bab el-Mandeb that any cables from Europe to East Asia have to go through

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago

I mean depending on how deep they are they wouldn't even really need that. I imagine you could just drop an anchor and drag it.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And the Vietnamese internet sharks.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

DEFINITELY A SHARK IN THAT PICTURE

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Can't you just drop a small anchor (on a decently large ship) and drag it along the sea floor? This type of attack doesn't submarines.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, in fact, that's what happened last time the whole Arab peninsula was knocked off the Internet.

[–] denast@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is there additional reading I can do on the topic? I've googled but found nothing but concerns from Nato officials that Russia could engage in seabed sabotage. This comment is universally praised so I guess it's some universal knowledge I missed. What are some instances when they did it?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Near the beginning of the Ukraine War, someone damaged an underwater pipeline. It was from Russia but Russia couldn’t use it because of sanctions. I don’t recall any one figuring out who it was, so everyone blamed Russia, except those blaming Ukraine , or somehow there was a reason for US

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

I thought it was Egypt?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You mean, like that time they blew up their own pipeline? Oh wait....

[–] Nobilmantis@feddit.it 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah right? Wasn't it ukranians that did that?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, but for like a full year the US, the EU, and the press blamed Russia. Even though it's obvious they knew full well who did it. Let alone that this explanation made no sense at all anyway.

Source for those who downvoted this: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would Russian government need to do this kind of thing? You should separate their PR part (which is destructive and incompetent) and things actually done.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would they do 90% of the idiotic shit they do?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One can imagine lots of reasons, confidently name none, which probably is the goal.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

First lie wins then after that the most interesting one

So if you do something wrong say you did something else worse and make every spend their time fighting that first story

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I had the same thing happen to my internet cables but it was the cat.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why was six afraid of seven?

Because seven was a registered six offender.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Holy new version batman

[–] Blackmist 3 points 8 months ago

Read that in Rhys Darby's voice by the end.

[–] julianschmulian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 8 months ago

jokes on you i almost always use wireless 🕶️

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've had it with these god damned sharks attacking my god damned internet cables

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

What’s funny is, sharks legitimately attack these kinds of cables regularly. They need to be adequately shielded to prevent shark attacks.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

As they say, you're more likely to get struck by lightning than attacked by a shark(unless you're an Internet cable)

[–] Boingboing@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Feels weird too say that my wifi is being shit cause of sharks but its true!

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Environmentalists don't like it when you bury too many sharks.

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

This caught me off guard. I'm lucky I wasn't drinking anything.

[–] shadeless@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 8 months ago

Because it's one thing to cruise along with a ship and just unspool some cable into the water but a whole other thing to dig hundreds of miles of trenches deep under water.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

People with shovels don't like to get wet.

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It's more expensive, especially in super deep water

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A nice picture of the cable paths with this article from 2015.

NPR article

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Nice, thanks!

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

Crazy how many cables there are through ice, or how many from one point to another on the same coast

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At least 15 submarine cables pass through the Bab al-Mandab Strait at the southern end of the Red Sea, a body of water just 26km wide at some points.

"The location of the cable break is significant due to its geopolitical sensitivity and ongoing tensions, making it a challenging environment for maintenance and repair operations," Seacom said.

Globes attributed the outages to the Iran-backed Houthis, and alleged the damage was "significant, but not critical," because several other undersea cables serve the region.

Peripheral vendor Logitech recently warned its supply chain would experience delays as a result of the Red Sea conflict.

While it's not clear what's exactly going on with subsea internet cables in the Red Sea right now, pinning blame on the Houthis isn't entirely out of left field - the Yemeni rebels threatened to damage comms infrastructure late in 2023.

Rear Admiral John Gower, a former Royal Navy submarine commander, told the BBC earlier this month that it would take a more sophisticated force than the Houthis, someone with submersibles capable of locating the cables to do the deed.


The original article contains 667 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

this what happened to AT&T?

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Those Vietnamese Internet sharks are getting to be a real problem. 😆