this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Humanities & Cultures

2519 readers
1 users here now

Human society and cultural news, studies, and other things of that nature. From linguistics to philosophy to religion to anthropology, if it's an academic discipline you can most likely put it here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Come as you are, Emily's book, is an absolutely fantastic book on this topic if you find it interesting.

[–] Boleano@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

This is great, thanks for sharing!

[–] metic@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

“That is not how biological scientists define the word ‘drive’.”

Her argument basic boils down to semantics.

[–] BlueNine@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

This all seems fine. But it seems, i don’t know, sort of small ball. Like, define the terms and do the work, but how does this matter? In this case the language has a broadly understood term: sex drive. But, we don’t say food drive or sleep drive. As a descriptivist, I start in a dubious position.

I never thought sex drive meant I would die if I didn’t get laid, nobody thinks that. I never thought using the word drive meant that there was entitlement.

If people are angry at Dr Nagoski for putting this idea out there, maybe she is hitting at SOMETHING that matters. Or, people are just angry at her for insisting this language matters at all. Hard to say I guess. I am pretty sure shitty people who do shitty things because they feel entitled to other peoples bodies, probably won’t become better if they use different words.

I’m fairness, she explicitly downplays the importance of this idea at one point in the video saying it is the oldest and simplest piece of science in her book. Perhaps she is only belaboring it due to the reactions the idea receives.