I hate the Tory party. I want Labour to get in.
Apart from this 28 billion pound investment, I cannot name one thing they actually stand for going into the election. This is a problem.
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)
UK Politics
3100 readers
266 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They stand for business! Or at least that's the latest thing they've been spinning.
Can’t trust Starmer. Can’t trust Reeves. Can’t trust Labour. Being not-the-Tories does not amount to anything.
Still better than 5 more years of actual Tories though.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The comments of Mr Reynolds and Ms Reeves appeared to suggest a theme: backing billions of pounds of green investment but letting the £28bn figure fall quietly by the wayside.
Because campaigning at the Kingswood by-election at around the same time Ms Reeves was speaking, Sir Keir Starmer restated the existing policy without any apparent qualms about using the figure.
Politically, it gets to one of the most important questions about Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Party: if it enters government later this year, how would it balance economic discipline with its ambitions to transform the country?
A year later, after the dramatic changes to the economic climate caused by Liz Truss's mini-budget, the target was adjusted such that a Labour government would meet it about halfway through its first term.
That's what worries Labour strategists who believe that the most important priority for Sir Keir is to demonstrate fiscal restraint, and that as a result he should drop the figure altogether while continuing to promise a significant increase in green investment.
After Chancellor Jeremy Hunt delivers his Budget on 6 March, Labour will have a clearer idea of the pre-election tax and spend status quo.
The original article contains 751 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Fuck Labour, fuck the Tories. Fuck everyone.
Sack them all and switch to a direct democracy. Why do we need "representatives" to travel to Westminster and vote in a manner that does not represent us? I mean, if they even show up for the vote.
Have competent civil servants/lawyers write the laws, then let people vote them into force. Then let people vote again when they come in and decide whether or not it's any good. A Brexit-style disinformation campaign cannot be sustained indefinitely, for everything, that's something that can only be managed roughly once every 4 years.