this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
212 points (100.0% liked)

196

16459 readers
1704 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BustlingChungus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hands up if you just held your wrist while turning it to see if you could feel the bones cross

[–] RedditRefugeeTom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

πŸ™‹ (idk of emojis work here, but I posted the android dude woth his hand up).

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Now I want every emoji on the internet followed by a brief explanation of what it is

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Worked for me.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and I’ve done it plenty of times including with everyone else in a biomechanics class

[–] eochaid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fun fact, being in pronation for long periods of time can put pressure on forearm muscles and restrict blood flow, causing RSIs. It's why a lot of ergo keyboards are tilted upwards towards the middle.

On the other hand (hah), pronation is super useful for throwing athletes - especially pitchers. Pronating during a pitch gives the ball a spin, which makes it fly faster. But it also reduces pressure on the shoulder by using the forearm muscles as a natural shock absorber.

The latter demonstrates one reason why we are "built like this". It's a very useful mechanism for survival, tool use, and agility. The former demonstrates one reason why our physiology is NOT "built for" for computer and office work.

[–] Certcer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Doesn't it make it fly further, not faster? Not sure if they're the same thing here, because I thought the spin counteracted some of the forces of gravity rather than just speeding up the ball so it went further before gravity got it down.

[–] TheDeadGuy@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not that scary. It's not bending or anything, it's just the larger bone swinging around the smaller stationary one. Joints pivot and move

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do y'all expect exactly? A ball bearing??

[–] Andiloor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe a ball and socket situation like the shoulder

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But your shoulder doesn't move like your forearm, does it? It only rotates in place, with a limited range. It can't completely flip like your forearm. Your muscles lock it in place, because they have to when it's in a ball and socket configuration, because the muscles are how you move the limb around in the socket, and there are a lot of insertion and origin points near or around that socket, limiting the range of movement there.

If you want to be able to completely flip the limb, you have to make it so that the parts can move against each other more freely along with the muscles, which a criss cross configuration like this allows for, because the part that moves the most, aka the part where it criss crosses, is where there are less insertion and origin points. That way the positioning of the muscles doesn't inhibit the movement.

[–] torafugu@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I use a ball bearing to rotate my pfp.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

As an engineer, it’s actually a really useful way to do it. Extra stability and comfort in rotation without any loss of control

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The question "why are we built like this", appears to imply a builder, of which there is none. We evolved this way, along with many other species. And on some level that actually had some randomness which in combination with real world fitness testing drove our evolution. Or you could take a short term view and say that you were "built" like this because your parents had sex, and these were the genes that combined to make you.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

β€œWhat advantage or chain of events caused this seemingly bad design to dominate?” Is that better?

[–] wedeworps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dementia is a state of failure that is unlikely to have severe negative effects on ability to reproduce.

Are you aware of the means by which natural and sexual selection occur and ultimately lead to speciation or are you simply applying Christian thinking to atheism?

[–] wedeworps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

What are we talking about again?

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"But God made us in his image"

Yeah? So why is my pleasure noodle, and my piss faucet the same organ? Why is my partners faeces dispenser an inch away from her baby cannon? When she gave birth, why did it rip open? Why, as a man, do I have nipples?

If this was all "built like this" I would like to have a go, because this seems like a beta test which received a failing grade.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LoL, have at, Bruh! Doubtless you've got this one. Def. no unintended consequences will result. Blah ha ha hahhaaaaa

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Hey, I'm an ideas guy, not an engineer. When I say combine the waste organs and leave the sex organs to be sex organs, that's the engineers job to figure out.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

β€œWhat advantage or chain of events caused this seemingly bad design to dominate?” Is that better?

[–] wedeworps@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Dementia is a state of failure that is unlikely to have severe negative effects on ability to reproduce.

Are you aware of the means by which natural and sexual selection occur and ultimately lead to speciation or are you simply applying Christian thinking to atheism?

[–] gaybear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

my hand fucking started hurting a little after seeing this AAAAHHHH

[–] LordAmplifier@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you keep turning your wrist, which bone will break first? Is it random, can they have different levels of bone health, or does one of them have a mechanical advantage?

[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firstly your shoulder would follow the rotation for as long allowed. Then something would be dislocating, but whether it would be the head of radius or your shoulder I cannot tell. From there you get a whole lot of soft tissue injuries.

If you'd somehow continue to pronate (rotate your hand "inwards") and fixated your upper arm, you'd probably get a fracture of the proximal ulna or distal humerus, as they are rotationally fixed to eachother.

Note, I have not tested this. This is only my intuition, as someone who knows a bit of anatomy and medicine.

[–] DrMango@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Probably has a lot to do with the position of your arm as well i.e. elbow bent, arm straight out front, to the side like a T-pose, disembodied arm being fixed and twisted in a macabre "science" machine, etc.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My first thought is it would be something like this (https://radiopaedia.org/articles/chauffeur-fracture?lang=gb) . According to radiopedia, that fracture came from the crank handle, of an old fashioned crank start car, reversing and impacting the dorsum/ back of the wrist. Additionally they use terminology, e.g. dorsiflexion? instead of extension, and abduction? instead of radial deviation which is a bit different than I was taught, and taught to others. Tho' that mechanism doesn't seem to be what I recall from school. In the off chance that I'm correct, as I recall the fracture occurred when one wrapped one's thumb around the crank handle, such that when the engine started the thumb would provide leverage against the radial styloid process. I've met people who own such antique cars, and have never heard of any of them making this mistake. So to answer your question, it's not random, few things actually are. It's the radial styloid.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί