I do not use whisparr specifically, but generally for the *arrs you can use jackett to support way more sites. It essentially converts site specific data formats to well known formats that the *arrs support.
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
36 points (92.9% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
53969 readers
329 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
💰 Please help cover server costs.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Or use prowlarr and sync downloaders/indexers to all *arr apps with 1 click.
Never used whisparr either, but it looks like there is enough feature parity with the other *arr apps that it'll probably Just Work™ out of the box with prowlarr.
Jackett is good, but surpassed by prowlarr. Can only recommend migrating.
Was not aware myself, thank you!
I have jackett. What indexers should i add
I don't know, add the sites where the content that you want can be found. I think Jackett also had links to the regular web pages if you want to look around.
I get the impression that you're new to the whole *arr set of applications.
Your indexer is the torrent site (or Usenet indexer) you're asking whisparr to search through for your torrents/NZBs.
Take a look here for some pretty good documentation on how it all works: https://wiki.servarr.com/whisparr/quick-start-guide#indexers
I use radarr and sonarr just fine. I just don't know what indexer to use for whisparr
Ah, I see, then my apologies for making assumptions. If you're a Usenet person then things like drunken slug or Ninja central assist to have a bunch of adult content on them.
For torrents, you'll hopefully be able to find content on various generalist torrent trackers or a few specialist ones that primarily deal with that kind of content.
Do the usual indexers not work well? Asking for science