this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
402 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Presidential hopefuls vying for a spot on Illinois’ March 19 primary ballot had to submit their nominating petitions to the State Board of Elections on Thursday or Friday. The loyalty pledge is not required but is a long-standing tradition that candidates undertake as part of that paperwork.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 109 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

perfect, so can this be pointed to as yet another tacit admission of being ~~a human piece of shit~~ an insurrectionist?

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That will not really hurt him in any way.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

His base is likely in favor of ending democracy to have a dictatorship of billionaires, but a chunk of people who haven't been paying attention much may care

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

lol people who didn't pay attention to the LITERAL FUCKING INSURRECTION might look at the fact he didn't sign paperwork and turn on him?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 17 points 10 months ago

A big chunk of the population doesn't realize that Biden and Trump are shoo-ins for their parties nominations, and reminding those people that Trump has doubled down on ending democracy is important.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Those people are beyond saving. But hopefully it will convince some of the "I don't like Biden so I'm gonna protest vote for some joke candidate" crowd to actually take the election seriously.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I don't see this being the 'turning point' for anyone if they haven't already turned on trump. This is basically jaywalking by his standards.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 85 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Probably because he IS planning to (try and) overthrow the government again if he looses in November.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah his plan probably boils down to:

A) Lose and overthrow

Or

B) Win and destroy our democracy

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 10 months ago

Wrong, if he loses then we have a better chance of stopping his attempts

[–] pozbo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It depends on if his plans go accordingly.

For context his afternoon plans were to NOT shit himself. You can have a guess how those plans turned out.

He's been pretty vocal about his plans if he wins.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think he is being backed into a corner where he is all in on either "winning" the election or using his cult (this includes members of congress/military/etc.) to try and take the government so he doesn't have to answer for his crimes. He basically has nothing left to lose, which is why it's scary that states are putting him on the primary ballot to begin with. Letting him win the nomination and then should the Supreme Court decide that he (or any/every) president have absolute immunity to commit crimes and that the 14th amendment applies to him, things are going to get a lot more ugly. If he makes it all the way till November I think we are going to see violence from the right that makes Jan. 6 seem like a warm-up run.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the supreme Court decides president have absolute immunity I hope Joe Biden straight up shoots him in the face.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 1 points 10 months ago

He never would, but I also hope that he doesn't step down and instead we hold another election that includes non-traitors. He should also have a constitutional amendment that 100% spell out in no law degree required language that a president (sitting or not) is ALWAYS subject to the law, and insurrection by a president should be a "lock them up while they await trial" offence.

[–] CodeName@infosec.pub 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Why not just lie about it like he does everything else? Take the oath. Who cares? Because this has become a selling point. Your crazy uncle and/or crazy parents want democracy to die and for this shit stained drug addled moron to become a dictator. It's the ultimate variation of sticking it to the libs.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 20 points 10 months ago

It's also a signal to the "troops".

He doesn't need to lie. One of the only things he's been right about is that he could shoot someone in the street and no one would do anything about it.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

sticking it to the very concept of liberty in its loosest definition 🤌

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He’s never won the popular vote and he never will

Because he sucks Putin and shits himself

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In this country you don’t need the popular vote, you just need land’s vote and electors on your side.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

They'll sacrifice their lives for a person who is demonstrably the actual biggest loser in history, and he just gets more loser-y, folks, okay... If any of you are starting to have your memories fade, here's a quick refresher to read this morning and then copy and send to your aunt karen in Missouri.

  • 0 re-elections won
  • 1 term president
  • 2 times impeached
  • 3 marriages
  • 4 inch lifts in his shoes
  • 5 kids, from 3 different mothers
  • 6 bankruptcies
  • 7 US Capitol police suing him for Jan 6 terrorist insurrection and murder of police
  • 8 trillion + dollars added to the US debt in a single term
  • 9 trump lawyers sanctioned by federal judge for lying in frivolous election fraud lawsuits and ordered to pay defendant's legal fees
  • 10 years that trump paid $0 in income taxes between 2000 and 2015. ($0 to cops, teachers, roads, prisons, disaster relief, etc)
  • 11 trump associates charged with serious crimes over the past 5 years
  • 12 million votes (the big lie) - trump claims he won the 2020 election by 12 million votes when in reality, he lost by about 7 million votes.
  • 13 of August, 2021 - one of multiple days that trump was supposed to magically become president again according to Qanon and a crack addicted pillow salesman (the two most respected information sources in the gop)
  • 14 year old girl in a youth choir that trump approached in 1992 to say, "Wow! Just think - in a couple years I'll be dating you."
  • 15 originally confirmed cases of COVID in the US trump said would soon be, “down to close to zero.” followed by, “like a miracle, it will disappear.” - over 1,000,000 Americans have since died of COVID and it continues to kill 4 years later.
  • 16 years old - age of daughter ivanka when she hosted "miss teen" pageant and, according to long time trump associate Noel Casler, "trump called her over in the middle of a rehearsal and had her give him a lap dance while he leered at the crew."
  • 17 known trump and russia investigations from local, state and federal prosecutors
  • 18 gop senators that ignored trump threats / warnings and supported Biden admin's infrastructure bill.
  • 19 as in COVID19 - trump was verified as the single largest source of disinformation on the virus, with a Cornell study claiming that 38% of the "misinformation conversation" originated with trump
  • 20 the day in January, 2021, when Biden was sworn in despite trump inciting a violent insurrection to stop election verification at the US Capitol.
  • 21 gun salute that trump ordered for himself when he left office after a humiliating defeat, even though he never served in the military, famously called military members "losers" and "suckers" and actively avoided the draft with a cowardly "bone spurs" excuse.
  • 22 date in August, 2021, when Alabama hate rally crowd booed trump for finally saying people should get vaccinated, only after 700,000 Americans have died due mostly to his failure as president
  • 23 as in wrestlemania 23 in 2007 where trump, a cartoon level failure with no other prospects, participated in a fake bet that a proxy wrestler would win a fake fight on his behalf or he would shave his wig and hair plugs off.
  • 24 day in August, 2021, when trump actually filed a lawsuit in Florida court against YouTube, a private company, demanding that they reinstate his YouTube channel like a desperate, irrelevant embarrassment with no platforms left to abuse.
  • 25 plus credible sexual assault allegations against trump, spanning decades and with accusers starting as young as 13 years old at time of assault.
[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (5 children)

The problem with trump’s next attempt at an armed rebellion is that he left the J6 traitors rotting in jail even when he was still president. He could have pardoned them all, but didn’t.

Are people really going to risk death or years in the federal pen a second time?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He seems to keep on getting people to sacrifice themselves for him. It's kind of a lifelong habit

[–] ech@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

He seems to keep on getting people to sacrifice themselves for him.

For nothing, too. It's absolutely bizarre. He has an expansive history of just dumping people the moment they become less than useful, and people still go out of their way to lay under the next bus.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Probably yes. These people aren't the cream of the crop.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 9 points 10 months ago

I think with all the chaos at the end of his term that he was talked out of pardoning them all (he wanted to originally). He has made it a promise to pardon most/all on day one when he is "being dictator for a day" as a campaign promise. And the fun of the cult is he 110% doesn't have to follow through on any of what he says/promises because he despises his followers and they love him for it.

[–] Xiaz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Its like how you deal with killbots. You send wave after wave of troop at them until they hit the limit of their kill count and deactivate.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

He wven said publicly he was going to pardon them, but not many have spoken up about it.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

long standing tradition

We’ve been holding our government together with the duct tape of “tradition” for too goddamn long and now it’s starting to peel off.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

I’d imagine hearing about this has made his traitorous loyalists are even more worshippy then they ever have been.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There are so many Republicans that say they don't trust the election anymore (thanks, Trump!). But how many are going to say they don't trust the election if Trump wins? None. None of them are going to say it was rigged if he wins.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

He was saying 2016 was rigged after he won. They'll say anything in the moment and it won't matter as soon as it leaves their mouths, it's wild.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

I have to say this pledge seems pretty stupid on the face of it. It's origins come from a very anti democratic place and the logic of it makes no sense since if you were planning to forcibly overthrow the government through a secret plan that involved running in the primaries you'd hardly let the cat out of the bag by skipping it, you'd just make the pledge and then do it.

This guy skipping it is for sure an ominous sign but he already wanted everyone to know this and the ootional and pointless pledge is providing a convenient means for a political stunt which is ironic since a stupid political stunt is what it sounds like it always was to begin with when people were forced to start making it for similar theatre.

Not saying it's not a concern though, it's a worrying marker of the changes of the political landscape where deliberately signalling a desire for insurrection is a smart and shrewd political move that's actually beneficial to a canditate when people point it out is a very dangerous place to be in.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

He has no plans to be loyal to anything but himself, so why waste energy on some random loyality pledge he does not intend to keep anyway?

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Did he do it last time or skip it? Not that it matters to his base either way.

Edit: he signed it in 2016

Also: "The oath remains enshrined in Illinois law but has been struck down as unconstitutional on free speech grounds in federal courts."