this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
353 points (93.2% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Sunshine State governor made a similar comment recently when he warned that Maine's ruling disqualifying Trump 'opens up Pandora's box'

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has revealed that he's "looking" into ways to block President Joe Biden from the 2024 primary ballot in Florida.

"This is just going to be a tit for tat and it's just not gonna end well," the GOP presidential candidate warned Friday alongside Rep. Chip Roy, R-TX, according to a video posted by CNN. "You could make a case — I'm actually looking at this in Florida now [if we] could we make a credible case" to block Biden from the ballot "because of the invasion of 8 million."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 283 points 10 months ago (3 children)

But like...that's the thing. They have to look for a credible case to remove their political opponents. In contrast, the reason to remove Trump is self-evident, even to Republicans.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 149 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Conservatives think any consequences they have is retaliation.

So they don't see the difference in this.

It's just the lack of empathy, if they do something illegal, they assume everyone else does it too so it's fine. If they get in trouble, it's obviously not fair because in their head they're being singled out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iBaz@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Everything Republicans do is retaliation for things Trump has done to himself. There are 0 credible reasons to remove Biden from ANY state ballot, but they’ll try to find a way regardless.

Then they will be sued, and they will lose. Unlike the GOP, the Democrats have really good lawyers.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 49 points 10 months ago

That's because GOP lawyers are too busy advocating for the death penalty for homosexuals in Africa

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What's more, if they are going to remove Biden for failing to prevent illegal immigration (despite actually having significantly higher arrest and deportation numbers under Biden than Trump), then they should reasonable have to remove Trump as well... given, you know, the whole insurrection thing. To not do so would imply that the supposed failure of a president to sufficiently address one very complicated issue (even though he's better than Trump on this issue by their own metrics) is worse than attempting to coerce officials into "finding" votes for him, conspiring to produce fraudulent electors, lying and defaming for months about supposed fraud that had no basis in fact, and, of course, inciting an insurrection on the capital building.

[–] iBaz@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

And they won’t give Biden the money to fix a border crisis because they know it will help his approval numbers leading up to the election.

[–] QHC@lemmy.one 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

More importantly, the Democrats also have better arguments and facts (at least in this case).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Yep. If there was a credible case, it would already be motoring through the court.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 140 points 10 months ago (3 children)

god this is going to be such a stupid year

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 83 points 10 months ago (3 children)

No, it’s gonna be a stupid decade or even longer. And it’s already been going on for a while. Thats what you get when for years you ignore a dysfunctional education system and promote idiotism. It doesn’t vanish over night and finds its way into public discord. Then it’s years of not strong enough responses to totalitarian practices and you get another fascist italy or nazi germany.

Trump tried to overthrow the government and he is still allowed to run for president. Im just hoping the title of a history book chapter describing this will not be “causes for 3rd world war”, but I’m not optimistic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I honestly expect this year's stupidity to trump all previous ones

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago
[–] cogman@lemmy.world 105 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Good ole fascism.

This is a play to delegitimize the courts. Fascists know that Trump deserves to be knocked off the ballot and that Biden does not. They don't care. It serves them well to have their case laughed out of court so they can campaign off removing the deep state from the courts.

Man I wish there was a way to penetrate fascist propaganda.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 51 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My grandfather says that .308 does a good job penetrating fascist propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“This is just going to be a tit for tat and it’s just not gonna end well,”

I still can’t get over a political leader admitting to abusing the power of his office for personal spite, and not being removed from office

[–] Otkaz@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Personal spite, hell try personal gain. Don't forget this asshole is running for president. Should hit him with election tampering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

Sounds like giving comfort to an insurrectionist. We should remove him from office.

[–] los_chill@programming.dev 55 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Credible"... Can you define that Mr. DeSantis?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Narrator: He couldn’t.

[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

This clown will be quickly forgotten. Deservedly so. What a colossal embarrassment.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

He's just such a little bitch, fucking lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hey hey guys wait maybe he's got a point....

...Let's remove ALL of them from the ballot and purge all the old money from politics to find candidates that actually represent the people of their nation. 🤔

If only we could then dump that campaign money into schools and a national train system...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad I will be canceling out one dumbass vote in Florida....there's literally dozens of us who aren't Nazis tired of this stupid short fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soltros@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This "we're gonna remove Biden from the ballot" thing is the most elaborate masturbating contest between the GOP, man.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If DeSantis were even remotely serious about his Presidential campaign this wouldn't be the play. Trump being removed from the ballot would not require retaliation and would be good for him. But let's be honest here. He's known he's not running a Presidental campaign for months now. He cratered. The best old puddin' fingers can hope for is somehow getting Trump to pick him for VP.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I still can't believe DeSantis eats pudding with his fingers like a total fucking psychopath.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly. Republicans are nothing but a bunch of children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 35 points 10 months ago

republicans don't run on credibility.

they're practically immune to credibility, let alone merely blind to it.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 10 months ago

Do normal people openly and candidly characterize their own motivations as "tit for tat"? I thought that was typically pejorative.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 30 points 10 months ago

He knows GOP voters don’t follow up on anything and their memories don’t extend beyond the last Fox News show they watched. That’s why he can say shit like this knowing full well he won’t come up with anything.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What do we mean when we say that first of all we seek liberty? I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes; believe me, these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it. While it lies there it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it.

— Hon. Billings Learned Hand

When we have devolved to "tit for tat" when we're no longer looking for liberty and justice. There is nothing our Constitution can do, there isn't some magic arrangement of words written by long dead men that saves us, that saves our notions of liberty and justice.

It will not be denied, that power is of an encroaching nature, and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.

— James Madison (Federalist 48)

James Madison is talking about power-grabs here. He's stating that, there's never going to be some magic law written down on paper that's going to stop power-grabs. People, the people we put into to power, the people who have the trust of the public. People That's it. That's all there is. That's the only thing that stops it. And when the people aren't there to stop it…

You cannot.

This is why this kind of talk is dangerous. This is why making it personal and not looking to protect the public is bad. Because, like it or not, people like DeSantis, if they're not defending this nation, if they are simply looking to "tit for tat" to make some sort of point. They hold a mighty amount of trust and they're using it to be on the look out for retribution rather justice.

There aren't any magic words in the Constitution, it's inside our heads that matters. This is the stuff that starts getting sobering.

[–] Machindo@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do you post any writing online? I'd like to hear more. Your quotes and analysis were pretty poetic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

whataboutism over 9000

[–] bwf93@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Everyone keeps forgetting about the part of the constitution that bars you from holding office if you are a Democrat.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Do it, pussy.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Of course this was going to happen, at least in their speech. The difference of course is that there's absolutely no legally valid reason to remove Biden from anything, whereas there are plenty of legal, ethical, culinary and aesthetic reasons to remove Trump from this planet into the sun.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (10 children)

"Looking for an excuse" is not the same as "Acknowledging undisputed facts."

Nobody on the right is even pretending Trump didn't try to prevent Congress from certifying the election by sending illegitimate electors and sending a mob to storm the the Capitol.

If Biden had engaged in insurrection, I'd want him out. If there was proof of an impeachable offense, I'd support that as well.

That's the thing. Most people on the left are arguing in good faith. It's just that it's the GOP committing the crimes right now.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

DeSantis can suck my left nut

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

Judging on how much he screams about gays, he just might be into that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago (10 children)

What do these idiots have against immigrants ? they're immigrants themselves

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Vytle@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Land of the "free" Home of the "brave"

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Ideally, the case would come before the consequence. Imagine getting called into court and ordered to pay your neighbor 50k. "For what?!" you exclaim. "We're still building the case," they smugly respond.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

That's hilariously desperate.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How many years do we have to keep hunter's laptop and Biden bad. Find the evidence or stfu.

[–] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago

They will never stfu. The lack of evidence is just further proof of a giant conspiracy to these folks.

I liked it a lot better when the conspiracy theory nutjobs treated the x-files as a documentary and were convinced the government was hiding evidence aliens were among us.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

this is why he's losing outside of florida and why he needed to purge thousands of voters in florida to win in florida

load more comments
view more: next ›