this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

13 readers
1 users here now

A magazine for news and discussion about a small Silicon Valley fruit company.  ### See also

founded 1 year ago
 

The White House has announced a plan intended to improve the security of smart home tech. The government will test...

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MiataMan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because nothing says "trustworthy security" more than a govt endorsement.....

[–] tojikomori@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's surprising that Apple isn't listed (among those backing the scheme) given that the company designed the HomeKit standard with security and privacy as key objectives.

I think that's the conflict: Apple has its own certification programs. From Apple's perspective, a successful government-backed trademark would compete with Apple trademarks for consumer mindshare and the certification would add new overhead to Apple's own product launches.

Other brands backing this program have more to gain than lose from it, e.g. because their own certifications aren't as well marketed, or because it simplifies product screening, or sets up new hurdles for competitors. Apple's in a unique position where none of those benefits are relevant. It only sees the costs.

load more comments
view more: next ›