this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)

UFOs

2689 readers
1 users here now

This community is for discussion surrounding UFOs and Extraterrestrials.

Rules

  1. Be your own moderator
    • Think before you post or comment, and use your common sense about what is acceptable. This is a community space and should ultimately be community-driven. Be the community you want to see here.
    • If you are here because you want to make fun of or grandstand over all of the silly people who believe that UFO/UAPs may exist, you are not welcome. Just block the community and go about your day.
  2. Be Civil
    • No trolling or being disruptive.
    • No insults or personal attacks.
    • No accusations that other users are shills/agents. If you have some kind of evidence of this, please report instead.
    • No hate speech or abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
    • No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
    • No witch hunts or doxxing.
    • No summarily dismissive comments (e.g. "Swamp gas.").
  3. Posts must be related to UFO/UAPs
  4. Avoid duplicate posts
  5. Link posts should contain the linked content and a submission statement
    • Submission statements should contain a summary of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, and optionally personal perspectives.
    • For short-form content, such as tweets, include the entire text.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunchingBag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like they're going to release some very ancient, very unsatisfying reports and a few fuzzy videos and claim that's all they ever had. I hope not, but I'm skeptical this is as revelatory as it seems.

[–] G_Wash1776@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They used the word disclosure 79 times in this document. It being proposed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is significant, he’s already said “I am honored to carry on the legacy of my mentor and dear friend Harry Reid and fight for the transparency that the public has long demanded surrounding these unexplained phenomena.”

I think this is the big one, especially when there’s language like this in the amendment

All Federal Government records concerning unidentified anomalous phenomena should carry a presumption of immediate disclosure and all records should be eventually disclosed to enable the public to become fully informed about the history of the Federal Government’s knowledge and involvement surrounding unidentified anomalous phenomena.

(4) Legislation is necessary because credible evidence and testimony indicates that Federal Government unidentified anomalous phenomena records exist that have not been declassified or subject to mandatory declassification review as set forth in Executive Order 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note; relating to classified national security information) due in part to exemptions under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), as well as an over-broad interpretation of "transclassified foreign nuclear information", which is also exempt from mandatory declassification, thereby preventing public disclosure under existing provisions of law.

Legislation is necessary because credible evidence and testimony indicates that Federal Government unidentified anomalous phenomena records exist that have not been declassified or subject to mandatory classification review as set forth in Executive Order 13526 due in part to exemptions under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as well as an overbroad interpretation of "transclassified foreign nuclear information", which is also exempt from mandatory declassification, thereby preventing public disclosure under existing provisions of law.

[–] SunPowered@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think everything will be a drip. The fact that there is tightly controlled language on disclosure in a real bill being discussed should not be understated.

It might just go as you claim, however it will be far from over. Keep in mind, this renewed interest from Congress has been spurred by the fact that they have been deceived for a very long time. If Congress don't get anything substantial from this, I can't see them being ok with it. They might deem it too damn scary to be made fully public in which case we will only see the ancient grainy things.

[–] ProphetAlex@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either this is a planned or unplanned disclosure, but regardless it really seems like it's happening!

[–] G_Wash1776@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It will be definitely be a controlled disclosure, I think Grusch’s testimony really changed things.