this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Credible Defense

432 readers
11 users here now

An unofficial counterpart to the subreddit r/CredibleDefense, intended to be a supplementary resource and potential fallback point. If you are an active moderator over there, please don't hesitate to contact me to be given a moderation position.

Wiki Glossary of Common Terms and Abbreviations. (Request an addition)

General Rules

Strive to be informative, professional, gracious, and encouraging in your communications with other members here. Imagine writing to a superior in the Armed Forces, or a colleague in a think tank or major investigative journal.

This is not at all intended to be US-centric; posts relating to other countries are highly encouraged.

No blind partisanship. We aim to study defense, not wage wars behind keyboards. Defense views from or about all countries are welcome so long as they are credible.

If you have experience in relevant fields, understand your limitations. Just because you work in the defense arena does not mean you are always correct.

Please refrain from linking the sub outside of here and a small number of other subs (LCD, NCD, War College, IR_Studies, NCDiplomacy, AskHistorians). This helps control site growth (especially limiting surges) and filters people toward those with a stronger interest.

No denial of war crimes or genocide.

Comments

Should be substantive and contribute to discussion.

No image macros, GIFs, emojis or memes.

No AI-generated content.

Don’t be abrasive/insulting.

No one-liners, jokes, insults, shorthand, etc. Avoid excessive sarcasm or snark.

Sources are highly encouraged, but please do not link to low-quality sources such as RT, New York Post, The National Interest, CGTN, etc. unless they serve a useful purpose.

Be polite and informative to others here, and remember that we should be able to disagree without being disagreeable.

Do not accuse or personally challenge others, rather ask them for sources and why they have their opinions.

Do not ask others about their background as it is rude and not encouraging of others to have an open discussion.

Please do no not make irrelevant jokes, offtopic pun threads, use sarcasm, respond to a title of a piece without reading it, or in general make comments that add nothing to the discussion. Please refrain from top-level jokes. Humor is appreciated, but it should be infrequent and safe for a professional environment.

Please do not blindly advocate for a side in a conflict or a country in general. Surely there are many patriots here, but this is not the arena to fight those battles.

Asking questions in the comment section of a submission, or in a megathread, is a great way to start a conversation and learn.

Submissions

Posts should include a substantial text component. This does not mean links are banned, instead, they should be submitted as part of the text post. Posts should not be quick updates or short-term. They should hold up and be readable over time, so you will be glad that you read them months or years from now.

Links should go to credible, high-quality sources (academia, government, think tanks), and the body should be a brief summary plus some comments on what makes it good or insightful.

Essays/Effortposts are encouraged. Essays/Effortposts are text posts you make that have an underlying thesis or attempt to synthesize information. They should cite sources, be well-written, and be relatively long. An example of an excellent effort post is this.

Please use the original title of the work (or a descriptive title; de-editorializing/de-clickbaiting is acceptable), and possibly a sub-headline.

Refrain from submissions that are quick updates in title form, troop movements, ship deployments, terrorist attacks, announcements, or the crisis du jour.

Discussions of opinion pieces by distinguished authors, historical research, and research on warfare relating to national security issues are encouraged.

We are primarily a reading forum, so please no image macros, gifs, emojis, or memes.

~~Moderators will manually approve all posts.~~ Posting is unrestricted for the moment, but posts without a submission statement or that do not meet the standards above will be removed.

No Leaked Material

Please do not submit or otherwise link to classified material. And please take discussions of classified material to a more secure location.

In general, avoid any information that will endanger anyone.

#Please report items that violate these rules. We don’t know about it unless you point it out.

We maintain lists of sources so that anyone can help to find interesting open-source material to share. As outlets wax and wane in quality, please help us keep the list updated:

https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/credibleoutlets

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thank you for your submission! We do request that you add a submission statement to your post--a short paragraph or so justifying the existence and relevance of the article you shared. I'll go ahead and whip one up for you since I have the time but, in the future, please include such a statement when you make your post.

Submission Statement

The war in Ukraine has shown that even short occupations by Russian forces can result in devastating consequences for civilians and countries alike. In response to these events, as well as increased anxiety from its Eastern European counterparts, NATO has recently shifted its posture from a system of "tripwire forces" to a plan to "defend every inch". Such a system will require massive investments in logistics, equipment, and manpower. This announcement showcases one aspect of manpower investment, the activation of reserves for exercises and deterrence purposes. However, it also speaks to difficulties the US is having in balancing an acute need for manpower with a shrinking volunteer force. The reservist will not be adding to the overall troop numbers already in Europe but will allow commanders to deploy reservist personnel as they see fit. For further context and analysis on this action, I recommend the Washington Post's article "Pentagon may activate up to 3,000 reservists for Russia deterrence".

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks I'll do better next time!

[–] Ieatcrayons@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we all know how this will be portrayed in pro-russian media.

As an aggression against Ukraine, which it obviously is, from which helpless Ukrainians must be rescued.

It's starting

load more comments
view more: next ›