Antivaxxers now pro-abortion to avoid forced ultrasound vaccinations.
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
739 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
59204 readers
3707 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
As interesting as that would be to happen, in reality, there's just going to be a bunch more people going without pre natal care.
Which is going to be most red states in the next decade. Great time to be in the little coffin business though.
load more comments
(4 replies)
While this is awesome, I can already imagine anti-vaxxers are now deathly afraid of ultrasounds lol
Brace yourselves! Vaccination with sound conspiracies coming in!
“The IRS called, they vaccinated me trough my phone in my ear!!?”
“Mass vaccinations trough radio!!?”
As much as I hate fucking mobile alerts, they already thought the last test was some magical bullshit.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(25 replies)
I think that's the basic premise of the Star Trek hypospray. Pressure pushing in medicine rather than a needle.
Actual hyposprays have been around since the 60's. They are, by all account, quite painful and ironically not very hygienic.
My favorite anecdote, though not necessarily mine, about jet inoculation comes from the army. They had long lines of men to immunize and little time to do it. Walk up, hold still, hear the click, feel the water pierce you, walk away sore. However, if anyone moved even slightly during the process, the needle of water becomes a knife, slicing their shoulder open. It was not a well thought out mechanism.
load more comments
(3 replies)
A lot slower, though. Article says it takes a minute and a half.
It takes my kid half an hour of screaming and throwing a public fit just to get within two miles of a needle, so I'll take it.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
In other news, conservatives have introduced a bill to outlaw ultrasound machines.
Since vaginal ultrasound is how they detect a "fetal heartbeat" at 6 weeks (the heart isn't yet formed or pushing any blood, but there's an electronic pulse) at which point abortion is illegal in many states, that might be a good thing.
Although, as ultrasound is also how my overdue fetus was diagnosed with the umbilical cord wrapped 3x around the neck, leading to a quick C-section and healthy baby, I would rather keep the ultrasound machines and lose the lunatics.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The ultrasound waves are how they activate the 5g tracking chips, it's all in their plan I got from this website I found on page 68 of Google.
Great, a new thing for the lunatics to rant about.
I was gonna say oh now they are gonna say that's what the 5g towers are REALLY for 🙄🙄🙄
At this point if it was possible to orchestrate some massive conspiracy to vaccinate people en masse, we should just do that. They'll shout about it either way, but this way they'll at least be vaccinated
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
And here come the conspiracy theories...
No joke. The first thing that popped into my mind when reading the title was: "great, now my father will be afraid to do an ultrasound test"
load more comments
(1 replies)
History proves we do the cheapest, easiest, and fastest. So allow me to shit all over this idea...
- This is slow at 1.5 mins vs a needle takes about 5 secs.
- Takes skill to operate an ultrasound machine and probably training to get a consistent dose vs pull needle to this line and jab in arm to know you got it all in there.
- Every Rite Aid and CVS would need an ultrasound machine vs here are these cheap disposable needles that require no power or maintenance.
Sure they might develop it faster or make a new more portable thing. But that's going to take a long long time when no one gives a shit to invest money in a new thing when needles work.
As with all new inventions/procedures, this is just the first step. The process will become faster and more efficient in the future.
In my opinion, this is a great first step towards a Star Trek-like hypospray.
load more comments
(1 replies)
No one is suggesting this be put in practice in its current form, that would be insane. That said, this is a good first step for alternative forms of vaccination. “First step” being the important part.
load more comments
(9 replies)
We are one step closer to hypo sprays from Star Trek. I don't like needles so this will be really neat to see in mass adoption.
Hyposprays already were invented, mass produced, used as standard in the military for several years, and abandoned because they weren't as hygienic as needles.
Anything that pushes through the skin into the blood pushes pathogens in too. Statistically, needles were safer so hyposprays were abandoned.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Sitting for a minute and a half, not including prep and cleanup, or just getting stabbed a little. shrug
Edit: To save the next half dozen people exclaiming "needles!" the trouble. I would refine my point to, "great to have the option but I imagine it as being more of a fallback than the beginning of a new era".
For people like me who go down for a half hour and feel like a train wreck for 8 hours when they get stabbed a little, I'll take a 1.5min one.
If you told me I needed to run on a treadmill for an hour while the ultrasound worked, I'd STILL take it over getting stabbed a little.
load more comments
(13 replies)
Needle phobias are extremely common, and the thing about phobias is that you're fully aware that the fear isn't coming from a rational place, which is part of what makes them so frustrating to deal with.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(11 replies)
So, now antivax mothers can't get ultrasound anymore while they're pregnant?
load more comments
(4 replies)
If they can do this for insulin which sounds like it's the same this is a game changer
Sweet, now they can charge me $1k for a shot and not use a needle.
Last time I got an ultrasound the hospital charged me $2k. Wanted to confirm nothing was wrong with my kidneys. Turns out I was all good, but now I have an expensive bill to deal with...
load more comments
(3 replies)
I guess it's interesting but this seems to have minimal use case. For those with reactions to injections and such it's useful, but it seems much easier to use a needle in most cases. Also that article claims that it "doesn't damage the skin", but I don't see why a vaccine would cause any meaningful damage to the skin in the first place.
Edit: Okay I'm seeing now how this would be useful for more frequent injections like insulin and such if it can be used like that.
It literally tears a hole in the flesh with a puncture wound. It's the definition of damaging.
Minor damage, but damage none the less.
load more comments
(5 replies)
view more: next ›